General Chit-Chat Thread - No Spoilers

[Smart Marx]

Nukes aren't arms. That's where every control advocate tries to go. We don't need nukes so stop trying to straw man that into the conversation. The government shouldn't even have nukes and they ain't gonna nuke their own citizens anyway.

 

[Chris]

How are nukes not considered arms though? Define arms for me then

 

[Chris]

I thought it was weapons

 

[Deezy]

Ask some injuns how easy it is to overthrow the government

 

[Hoss]

Sure, in the 18th century you could have enough militias assembled to fight a nation's military but in 2019 the American government is just gonna vaporize a whole lotta motherfuckers on a moment's notice. You'll never have enough arms to stop that.

 

[Smart Marx]

Bombs in general aren't arms. We're talking guns, dog. Nukes, or general, citizens don't need bombs. That's not be stupid.

 

[Deezy]

Where's my mustard gas?

 

[Smart Marx]

Y'all missing the point. It don't matter if we're successful or not, but if some Hitler-esq motherfucker decides to turn the US on it's own citizens, we're allowed to fight back. This country was literally founded on us beat our own government. The mightily superior British royal army.

 

[Grimoire Lenin]

How the fuck did things go political and I wasn't around to see it?

 

[Deezy]

Founded on blood.....so let's keep celebrating bloodshed....k

 

[Chris]

So you draw a line at bombs for what weapons should be legal, that's really all I was looking for since I've never heard a clear definition of what's considered "arms" bc it seems to be a gray area to me

 

[Grimoire Lenin]

Also we barely beat the English, Smark. You have to give France and Spain the assist.

 

[Grimoire Lenin]

Also hi guys. I love you all

 

[Chris]

But you also said the 2a means we should have access to the same arms as the government, but if you don't think the government should have bombs either then that's fair

 

[Deezy]

Clutching to the Constitution like a fundamentalist