- Joined
- May 21, 2011
- Messages
- 25,276
- Reaction score
- 745
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 45
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
Since the 12th Star Trek movie just made it into theatres, I thought it would be nice to go back and look at all the ones that came before it. Hopefully there's some Star Trek fans around here, or else I guess I'll be talking to myself in here!
An alien phenomenon of unprecedented size and power is approaching Earth, destroying everything in its path. The only starship in range is the USS Enterprise--still in drydock after a major overhaul. As Captain Willard Decker readies his ship and his crew to face this menace, Admiral James T. Kirk arrives with orders to take command of the Enterprise and intercept the intruder. But it has been three years since Kirk last commanded the Enterprise on its historic five year mission... is he up to the task of saving the Earth?
If you’ve never heard of Star Trek before I have but one question…where the hell have you been living for your entire life, under a rock? Yes indeed, the odds of coming across someone who hasn’t at least heard of one of the most popular film and television franchises of all time are as likely as Commander Spock cracking a smile. It’s been around in one form of media or another since its inception way back in 1966 and while its popularity has waxed and waned over the years there’s no denying its cultural impact. Originally designed as a way for creator Gene Rodenberry to use science-fiction to make broad social commentary on issues of the day, the show has morphed into a global brand that rivals any other media franchise out there. However, this is not the story of the Star Trek franchise, but rather the films that were inspired by it. Over the next couple of weeks we’ll be looking at all of them, up to and including the most recent film, 2013’s Star Trek Into Darkness. Hopefully many of you have already seen these films and will have fun reminiscing on them with me while those of you that haven’t will be inspired to seek them out and enjoy them as much as countless others have. Our first film is Star Trek: The Motion Picture, released to great fanfare in 1979. Star Trek had already gained a wide degree of popularity in syndicated television form, but this film, modeled on a script from an abandoned second series, was set to take the franchise to a whole new galaxy. The only question left was if it would succeed financially while still appeasing the legions of fans that had been clamoring for it for years?
Series creator Gene Rodenberry turned to experienced director Robert Wise (The Day the Earth Stood Still, The Sound of Music, West Side Story) while he supervised the script, which was written by noted science-fiction author Alan Dean Foster and television writer Harold Livingston. The story itself was actually a recycled plot from the abandoned show “Star Trek: Phase II†and it definitely seems like it, though that’s not really a good thing. Unfortunately the script just doesn’t have enough depth to it to maintain itself over the films 2+ hour runtime. To compensate for this, Wise foolishly decided to show as many expensive special effects shots as possible, clearly inspired by the success of Star Wars just a couple of years earlier. The problem with that was that Star Wars actually had a fleshed out story that cohesively tied the effects together to create a perfect balance. By contrast, Star Trek: The Motion Picture seems almost like a way for the studio to recoup the enormous financial costs of designing models and effects for the abandoned Star Trek: Phase II show. I’m not kidding when I say that there are times where it takes ships literal minutes of screen time to fly from one place to another, and don’t even get me started on Spock’s trip to the heart of V’Ger. If this had been a television episode, it would have worked quite well, as the themes of Star Trek are well represented and explored. Unfortunately, an episode of Star Trek was only 45 minutes long, so I’m pretty sure you can figure out why it doesn’t work as well as it should. Regardless, it’s a very well made film and certainly a nice looking one, but style over substance has never been what made the Star Trek franchise successful.
One of the major coups of the producers of the film was to reassemble the entire principal cast from the original television series, something that had never been done before to that point. Indeed it would prove to be one of the most important factors to the success of the film, as the rabid fans just wouldn’t have accepted new actors in the roles of their beloved characters. As the cast is definitely an ensemble, there aren’t many standout performers, though we do need to take a brief moment to look at a few of them. First of all, William Shatner, who plays Admiral James T. Kirk, is well-known as one of the all-time great over-actors and here he’s at his absolute best. The scene where Spock first enters the bridge is a prime example of his hilarious “style†of emotive acting. Spock himself, played by Leonard Nimoy, actually seems pretty wooden here (even by Vulcan standards) and doesn’t seem to add much to the film until the climactic mind meld with the antagonist. The rest of the principal cast is their usual solid selves, with standout performances from James Doohan as Chief Engineer Montgomery Scott and DeForest Kelly as Chief Surgeon, Dr. Leonard McCoy. I’d also like to give a shout out to George Takei’s work as Mr. Sulu, if only because of how stoned he looks when Kirk first arrives on the bridge! Meanwhile, a couple of new faces show up to help drive the film forward, Captain Matt Decker, played by Stephen Collins and Ilia, played by Persis Khambatta. These two also appear to have been abandoned characters from Phase II, though if you look at them closely you’ll see that they eventually became Commander Riker and Deanna Troi from Star Trek: The Next Generation. Collins is actually quite good as Decker and has some strong chemistry with Shatner, while Khambatta is fucking hot; no I mean SMOKING FUCKING HOT!!!!
Before 1979, fans of the series had only been able to enjoy the adventures of the Enterprise crew on small tube televisions and so a lot of the grandeur of the series may have been lost in translation. Star Trek: The Motion picture changed all that, as Wise created a larger-than-life presentation of the Star Trek experience. More often than not, this plays out like a gigantic love letter to every facet of the original series, from the characters to the Enterprise itself. However, while the film does its level best to focus on the characters and the effects, the story that ties the experience together represents both classic Trek and some of the deeper sci-fi films of previous decades. If there is one complaint here, besides the extended effects shots I've mentioned before, it's that the film itself is almost too similar to an original series episode entitled "The Changeling". I felt that the original idea was expanded on properly, but that it just screamed of the writers not wanting to rock the boat too much, something that doesn't come as much of a shock to me. Clearly they were more interested in sticking with the tried, tested and true formula and ramming as many effects down our throats as possible, which I'd say they succeeded at. This minor issue aside, I really enjoyed Star Trek: The Motion Picture on this re-watch and while I don't think it's the best in the film series it is by no means the worst.
Star Trek: The Motion Picture was shot on a budget of $46 million and earned over $139 million at the box office, very respectable numbers and certainly enough to warrant a sequel. It should also be noted that the film features the introduction of the now-iconic Star Trek theme, one perhaps even more recognizable than that of the original series, the music later serving as the opening theme to the "Star Trek: The Next Generation" television series. For this alone its legacy is firmly cemented in Star Trek lore, but the truth of the matter is that it’s just a great first chapter for the film series and one that allowed it to get off on the right foot. Once that first step was taken, the sky was the limit and as we’ll see in our next review, things could only get better. 7/10.
An alien phenomenon of unprecedented size and power is approaching Earth, destroying everything in its path. The only starship in range is the USS Enterprise--still in drydock after a major overhaul. As Captain Willard Decker readies his ship and his crew to face this menace, Admiral James T. Kirk arrives with orders to take command of the Enterprise and intercept the intruder. But it has been three years since Kirk last commanded the Enterprise on its historic five year mission... is he up to the task of saving the Earth?
If you’ve never heard of Star Trek before I have but one question…where the hell have you been living for your entire life, under a rock? Yes indeed, the odds of coming across someone who hasn’t at least heard of one of the most popular film and television franchises of all time are as likely as Commander Spock cracking a smile. It’s been around in one form of media or another since its inception way back in 1966 and while its popularity has waxed and waned over the years there’s no denying its cultural impact. Originally designed as a way for creator Gene Rodenberry to use science-fiction to make broad social commentary on issues of the day, the show has morphed into a global brand that rivals any other media franchise out there. However, this is not the story of the Star Trek franchise, but rather the films that were inspired by it. Over the next couple of weeks we’ll be looking at all of them, up to and including the most recent film, 2013’s Star Trek Into Darkness. Hopefully many of you have already seen these films and will have fun reminiscing on them with me while those of you that haven’t will be inspired to seek them out and enjoy them as much as countless others have. Our first film is Star Trek: The Motion Picture, released to great fanfare in 1979. Star Trek had already gained a wide degree of popularity in syndicated television form, but this film, modeled on a script from an abandoned second series, was set to take the franchise to a whole new galaxy. The only question left was if it would succeed financially while still appeasing the legions of fans that had been clamoring for it for years?
Series creator Gene Rodenberry turned to experienced director Robert Wise (The Day the Earth Stood Still, The Sound of Music, West Side Story) while he supervised the script, which was written by noted science-fiction author Alan Dean Foster and television writer Harold Livingston. The story itself was actually a recycled plot from the abandoned show “Star Trek: Phase II†and it definitely seems like it, though that’s not really a good thing. Unfortunately the script just doesn’t have enough depth to it to maintain itself over the films 2+ hour runtime. To compensate for this, Wise foolishly decided to show as many expensive special effects shots as possible, clearly inspired by the success of Star Wars just a couple of years earlier. The problem with that was that Star Wars actually had a fleshed out story that cohesively tied the effects together to create a perfect balance. By contrast, Star Trek: The Motion Picture seems almost like a way for the studio to recoup the enormous financial costs of designing models and effects for the abandoned Star Trek: Phase II show. I’m not kidding when I say that there are times where it takes ships literal minutes of screen time to fly from one place to another, and don’t even get me started on Spock’s trip to the heart of V’Ger. If this had been a television episode, it would have worked quite well, as the themes of Star Trek are well represented and explored. Unfortunately, an episode of Star Trek was only 45 minutes long, so I’m pretty sure you can figure out why it doesn’t work as well as it should. Regardless, it’s a very well made film and certainly a nice looking one, but style over substance has never been what made the Star Trek franchise successful.
One of the major coups of the producers of the film was to reassemble the entire principal cast from the original television series, something that had never been done before to that point. Indeed it would prove to be one of the most important factors to the success of the film, as the rabid fans just wouldn’t have accepted new actors in the roles of their beloved characters. As the cast is definitely an ensemble, there aren’t many standout performers, though we do need to take a brief moment to look at a few of them. First of all, William Shatner, who plays Admiral James T. Kirk, is well-known as one of the all-time great over-actors and here he’s at his absolute best. The scene where Spock first enters the bridge is a prime example of his hilarious “style†of emotive acting. Spock himself, played by Leonard Nimoy, actually seems pretty wooden here (even by Vulcan standards) and doesn’t seem to add much to the film until the climactic mind meld with the antagonist. The rest of the principal cast is their usual solid selves, with standout performances from James Doohan as Chief Engineer Montgomery Scott and DeForest Kelly as Chief Surgeon, Dr. Leonard McCoy. I’d also like to give a shout out to George Takei’s work as Mr. Sulu, if only because of how stoned he looks when Kirk first arrives on the bridge! Meanwhile, a couple of new faces show up to help drive the film forward, Captain Matt Decker, played by Stephen Collins and Ilia, played by Persis Khambatta. These two also appear to have been abandoned characters from Phase II, though if you look at them closely you’ll see that they eventually became Commander Riker and Deanna Troi from Star Trek: The Next Generation. Collins is actually quite good as Decker and has some strong chemistry with Shatner, while Khambatta is fucking hot; no I mean SMOKING FUCKING HOT!!!!
Before 1979, fans of the series had only been able to enjoy the adventures of the Enterprise crew on small tube televisions and so a lot of the grandeur of the series may have been lost in translation. Star Trek: The Motion picture changed all that, as Wise created a larger-than-life presentation of the Star Trek experience. More often than not, this plays out like a gigantic love letter to every facet of the original series, from the characters to the Enterprise itself. However, while the film does its level best to focus on the characters and the effects, the story that ties the experience together represents both classic Trek and some of the deeper sci-fi films of previous decades. If there is one complaint here, besides the extended effects shots I've mentioned before, it's that the film itself is almost too similar to an original series episode entitled "The Changeling". I felt that the original idea was expanded on properly, but that it just screamed of the writers not wanting to rock the boat too much, something that doesn't come as much of a shock to me. Clearly they were more interested in sticking with the tried, tested and true formula and ramming as many effects down our throats as possible, which I'd say they succeeded at. This minor issue aside, I really enjoyed Star Trek: The Motion Picture on this re-watch and while I don't think it's the best in the film series it is by no means the worst.
Star Trek: The Motion Picture was shot on a budget of $46 million and earned over $139 million at the box office, very respectable numbers and certainly enough to warrant a sequel. It should also be noted that the film features the introduction of the now-iconic Star Trek theme, one perhaps even more recognizable than that of the original series, the music later serving as the opening theme to the "Star Trek: The Next Generation" television series. For this alone its legacy is firmly cemented in Star Trek lore, but the truth of the matter is that it’s just a great first chapter for the film series and one that allowed it to get off on the right foot. Once that first step was taken, the sky was the limit and as we’ll see in our next review, things could only get better. 7/10.