Fantasy wrestling!

[Dolph'sZiggler]

Ah okay, so someone posts the whole show? Then our replies will be out-of-character feedback basically?

That's how I would do it, otherwise it would be a mess

 

[seabs]

Ah okay, so someone posts the whole show? Then our replies will be out-of-character feedback basically?

Seems like it. I assume it's structure is like this :
Zamorakian = Vince.
People who participate = Creative
The rest = the viewers.

 

[Crayo]

That's how I would do it, otherwise it would be a mess

Sounds good. :smile:

Seems like it. I assume it's structure is like this :
Zamorakian = Vince.
People who participate = Creative
The rest = the viewers.

As "creative" we'd only need to write the promos? Since the results are random. Lol it'll be so hard (or lucky) for someone to be given a push with random.org basically booking the show :hehe:

Would be good to incorporate WWE, TNA and RoH if we're going to go with real superstars.

 

[seabs]

Sounds good. :smile:


As "creative" we'd only need to write the promos? Since the results are random. Lol it'll be so hard (or lucky) for someone to be given a push with random.org basically booking the show :hehe:

Would be good to incorporate WWE, TNA and RoH if we're going to go with real superstars.

Yeah it's going to have to be agreed who gets the pushes beforehand. This is going to be awkward now.

 

[Crayo]

If you think I'm jobbing to you, you're crazy. :fire:

 

[seabs]

If you think I'm jobbing to you, you're crazy. :fire:

Bitch I'm Triple H...

 

[Tzesi]

Sounds good. :smile:


As "creative" we'd only need to write the promos? Since the results are random. Lol it'll be so hard (or lucky) for someone to be given a push with random.org basically booking the show :hehe:

Would be good to incorporate WWE, TNA and RoH if we're going to go with real superstars.

Maybe polls to decide the winner based on the gimmick. @[Crayo]

 

[Crayo]

Maybe polls to decide the winner based on the gimmick. @[Crayo]

Kind of makes the process longer though. Also spoils it for the viewers.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

There has to be some way to determine winners outside of random booking IMO.

 

[seabs]

The only way this could work is if one person handles it all or all the writers have a discussion for creative progression. Everyone must be on the same page so to speak.

 

[Zamorakian]

This can all be handled by the PM system or any chat room on the net, before promos or matches are executed things need to be discussed "backstage" or "behind the scenes".

Random.org could be used on matches such as John Cena vs Rock (Important match and it wouldn't be fair to let Rock win).
But for pushes and stuff that can be handled manually and wouldn't need the use of any random service.
You could mix up TNA, WWE and ROH superstars but that'd just be a big confusion considering they're all from different companies but it could work.

Creating gimmicks/characters can be an option too incase all WWE superstars are taken,
maybe we could be the first company to have a lower division like FCW and people could just make up a character and be on that federation, but we'd probably need more users for that and once we have more users you could implement that feature end of story.


I am CM PUNK!

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

I just think we the creative team (assuming I'm accepted as a part of that team) should try to gauge 'fan reactions' (from the responses in the thread) and base who gets pushed on that. Guys can have say if they don't agree they should do a job, and that's where the 'politicking' can come in. Guys who constantly complain may start to bitch to creative and if we disagree with them we could bury them, or if they make valid points we can take their complaints into consideration and give them some wins, change the loss from a clean loss to something else, ect. This way guys who deliver good promos, adjust their gimmicks, ect get rewarded

The Random decisions is a bit of a turn off for me.

 

[Crayo]

I just think we the creative team (assuming I'm accepted as a part of that team) should try to gauge 'fan reactions' (from the responses in the thread) and base who gets pushed on that. Guys can have say if they don't agree they should do a job, and that's where the 'politicking' can come in. Guys who constantly complain may start to bitch to creative and if we disagree with them we could bury them, or if they make valid points we can take their complaints into consideration and give them some wins, change the loss from a clean loss to something else, ect. This way guys who deliver good promos, adjust their gimmicks, ect get rewarded

The Random decisions is a bit of a turn off for me.

Agreed.

Even though many of you are pumped. I'd still prefer to wait when we know for sure we're going to have weekly active members. Still to young a forum to commit to something like a roleplay.

 

[seabs]

The best idea would be to start a recruitment thread. Keep it unofficial for a month or two then if it's still going make it an official thing imo.

 

[Zamorakian]

Agreed.

Even though many of you are pumped. I'd still prefer to wait when we know for sure we're going to have weekly active members. Still to young a forum to commit to something like a roleplay.

Dude no...we're almost 200 members come on this is enough.

You know what, do what seabs said start a recruitment thread and we'll see. State stuff like "Are you going to be weekly active" etc..