- Joined
- Mar 31, 2010
- Messages
- 368
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
- Age
- 40
- Location
- Wales, the land of beer and sheep.
I was reeling when you left me your comment. He comes online and like, I'm not even on-fucking-line. Jesus.
Don't worry, I'm including all of the stupid inside shit, not just Hayley. Nash too, of course.Beer said:Didn't think anyone gave a fuck about. Didn't include myself in the Hayley inside jokes of any of the aussies either.
.Beer said:Don't direct this at me as if I'm the one to blame for your lack of control over the aussies in 08/09. You were the admin, probably should have done something about it if it pissed you off so much, man.
Beer said:It isn't really that hard, but since you're a fucking blueberry I'll give you a few steps.
1. Read the thread.
2. Notice you wouldn't understand.
3. Leave the thread.
One small thread doesn't put the forum down the shitter, but hundreds of threads do. You trolls had no self control or respect for anyone else on the forum, and pointing that out to you gets a "your problem, not mine" response from you.Beer said:If you follow these steps blindly upon coming to a thread concerning the "inside jokes" I'm fairly sure you'll be much calmer and you won't get your panties in a twist, because you think one small thread is putting your forum down the shitter.
Again, I would love to ban a full list of you, but it never sticks and they always come back and do the same shit over. You Aussies never learned anything from the gaol even though we told you why it happened. C4, iamironman, and Blaze are still blueberries who think they're funny when they're not, and countless others who were banned were all unbanned and continue to spam. So, there's absolutely nothing that can ever really be done...except of course ruining their threads with off-topic posts like they do, apparently.Beer said:If you really think this forum is starting to suck terribly, how about you get off your high horse, get back on the forum as admin and do something about the masses of inbred smurfs roaming the Wrestling forums.
Don't worry, I'm including all of the stupid inside shit, not just Hayley. Nash too, of course.
I really, really need to stress to you I wasn't involved in that. Any of it. I'd talk with them and discuss in HIAT, but I wouldn't take it over into anywhere other than HIAT.
I did....it was called the gaol. I supported that shit, and it was me mentioning that I didn't like you fuckers ruining threads and making pointless topics that inspired it's creation. If it were up to me, a lot of members would have been banned permanantly (C4, Blaze, you, TBKB, Moonlight Drive, Sex Power, Kizza, John, Famous/Drama and more), but you all cried to someone else when one person did something, so you all ended up getting out of whatever it was that you did. Being an Admin wasn't a straight dictating move. If one admin banned someone, another would get tired of the bitching and unban them and we were back in square one. So don't act like I didn't do anything about it, I tried and the fact that it never helped was the main reason I stopped being active here.
We ruined the one, King of the Forum thread. It really meant that much to you? Again, it was all in HIAT. Should have gone in serious discussion if it meant something to you. At that time, in HIAT, we were encouraged to do whatever the fuck we wanted, under our own morals.
Ah yes, I know how to ignore threads, which I have been doing for the past 5 years on this forum since I couldn't make a ban stick. But why would anyone not being an attention whore want to make a thread that only one or two others would understand? What's the point?
Iunno, conversing with someone? Yeah, I guess I could have done a pm, but what difference does it make to you. I was just reaching out to Axis, trying to get him to log onto MSN.
One small thread doesn't put the forum down the shitter, but hundreds of threads do. You trolls had no self control or respect for anyone else on the forum, and pointing that out to you gets a "your problem, not mine" response from you.
It was in HIAT! How many more times will I have to stress this in one post.
Again, I would love to ban a full list of you, but it never sticks and they always come back and do the same shit over. You Aussies never learned anything from the gaol even though we told you why it happened. C4, iamironman, and Blaze are still blueberries who think they're funny when they're not, and countless others who were banned were all unbanned and continue to spam. So, there's absolutely nothing that can ever really be done...except of course ruining their threads with off-topic posts like they do, apparently.
Things have changed, Monk isn't the main guy in charge anymore.
Kizza said:Go wash the sand out of your vagina. You wanted to ban 80% of forum activity. Good job.
Maybe so, and everyone has the right to come in someone's thread and say "NASH" even if it was annoying as fuck and sucked the fun out of everything for everyone, but God forbid someone came in your pointless thread and ruin it by showing that they don't care.Beer said:I really, really need to stress to you I wasn't involved in that. Any of it. I'd talk with them and discuss in HIAT, but I wouldn't take it over into anywhere other than HIAT.
Bullshit. You ruined just about every thread in existence. The only reason you can think of that one thread is because that's when we finally became vocal about you hijacking threads for your seriously unfunny jokes. No, we did not care about that thread that much, it was just the straw that broke the camel's back. It's the simple fact that no one else could do anything without it being ruined.Beer said:We ruined the one, King of the Forum thread. It really meant that much to you? Again, it was all in HIAT. Should have gone in serious discussion if it meant something to you. At that time, in HIAT, we were encouraged to do whatever the fuck we wanted, under our own morals.
What difference does it make to me? Not much, but it sure as fuck wasted my time, which I voiced my displeasure over. Yes it could have gone in a PM, especially since it was a ONE-SIDED MESSAGE for ONE PERSON, and you made a DISCUSSION THREAD on a PUBLIC FORUM just to say "Hey Axis, get on MSN." Do you disregard logic on purpose?Beer said:Iunno, conversing with someone? Yeah, I guess I could have done a pm, but what difference does it make to you. I was just reaching out to Axis, trying to get him to log onto MSN.
A) This specific thread is in HIAT while there have been MANY that weren't in HIAT. B) Just because it's in HIAT doesn't make it any less annoying.Beer said:It was in HIAT! How many more times will I have to stress this in one post.
True, but I pretty much gave up hope a long time before that. And seeing as the ones who everyone knows should be banned aren't, I don't think those changes would have helped anyway.Things have changed, Monk isn't the main guy in charge anymore.
I don't really remember the exact details, but I'm pretty sure that you were voting for someone who was never even in it or was eliminated already. And no one voted it back down, Monk and I deleted all of the tainted posts.Kizza said:We didn't even really fuck that up. We just voted for Catsa over and over. Shouldn't by that logic, all the people that massively voted him down afterwards, also be banned?
First, it's quality not quantity. Second, so what if I did want to ban most of the forums activity. If you idiots can suck the fun out of this forum for someone who had so much time and passion for it, then you might be scaring away (or just flat out annoying the crap out of) potential long-term members since it's easier to get the newbies to hate this place because they don't know the good side. You'd rather stick with a lot of trash rather than work to obtain a lot of good posters. This forum was active and great for a long time when I first got here, and then it was run into the ground by Haily Williams and Nash plastered all over the place and serious threads being hijacked by idiots for their inside jokes. If that's the activity you want, then you have a seriously low standard for your ideal forum.
And so I did, but that was apparently thought as something I wasn't supposed to do in a section with NO RULES judging by the reaction I got.Kizza said:We hardly did it outside of Hell In A Thread. The extent that we apparently did all these NASH and HAYLEY jokes was hardly exposed outside of HIAT is amazingly exaggerated. If people are going to get pissy about stuff in a NO RULES section, then go ahead...
Again, if the activity is annoying and pointless, it's pretty worthless.Kizza said:....just don't blame the people that brought activity to the section and made it popular.
I know everyone else joined in. They had no choice. The only way to escape it was to go to another forum, which in case you didn't notice is what we didn't want. It was either try to join in and have fun with it, or get bored and leave. I don't blame the people trying to fit in, I blame the trend-setters. You put in a lot of time and work to plaster dumb jokes all over the place (yes, I know mostly in HIAT), and it overtook the activity of the forum. I was one of the ones who wouldn't join in and I got bored, and became less and less active.Kizza said:Stop acting like there was about 6-7 people involved, at one point or another, many others joined in. People didn't need to get involved, it got given attention, which is what we wanted. You have no one to blame but yourselves for not ignoring out shit, and then also joining in occasionally.
Maybe so, and everyone has the right to come in someone's thread and say "NASH" even if it was annoying as fuck and sucked the fun out of everything for everyone, but God forbid someone came in your pointless thread and ruin it by showing that they don't care.
You didn't ruin it and I don't really care for your comment. I started off by simply messing around. However, it escalated to this.
Bullshit. You ruined just about every thread in existence. The only reason you can think of that one thread is because that's when we finally became vocal about you hijacking threads for your seriously unfunny jokes. No, we did not care about that thread that much, it was just the straw that broke the camel's back. It's the simple fact that no one else could do anything without it being ruined.
Dude, you seriously need to calm and get the fuck over it. You REALLY got that pissed off at a bunch of guys just having a bit of fun in no rule threads? Man, if that's what grinds your gears then I do not envy you.
What difference does it make to me? Not much, but it sure as fuck wasted my time, which I voiced my displeasure over. Yes it could have gone in a PM, especially since it was a ONE-SIDED MESSAGE for ONE PERSON, and you made a DISCUSSION THREAD on a PUBLIC FORUM just to say "Hey Axis, get on MSN." Do you disregard logic on purpose?
Jesus christ, don't be so fucking pathetic. Obviously that is logical, but seriously, hardly fucking matters. You sure do have a pretty bad temper if 2 minutes of your precious time was wasted reading a thread that didn't concern you. I fully see why you seriously could get pissed off at that.
A) This specific thread is in HIAT while there have been MANY that weren't in HIAT. B) Just because it's in HIAT doesn't make it any less annoying.
A) Got proof? B) Babe, sowwy it hurt your feelings. All those bad forum users annoying you? Get over yourself. Your feelings towards HIAT threads don't come first all the time. Deal with the fact that I can post whatever I want in HIAT since that is the entire purpose of the section.
True, but I pretty much gave up hope a long time before that. And seeing as the ones who everyone knows should be banned aren't, I don't think those changes would have helped anyway.
Cool story, bro. It's all just this sop story for you, isn't it? "Gahh, hope is gone, all these annoying threads hurting my feelings. I can't fight it anymore!" News flash. No one cares. We're gonna keep posting, and if you feel like dragging yourself down into an even sadder state than you're already in, continue to moan and groan. Just don't expect people to care from this point onwards.