Stopspot said:You are underselling WWE and what the WWE wrestlers do quite a bit there. You say that WWE is not about wrestling, in 2012 alone we have seen an increase in amount of time spent in the ring of a whole 33% on RAW alone. More focus is put on wrestling and talented wrestlers with the rise of guys like Daniel Bryan, Seth Rollins, Antonio Cesaro and Alberto Del Rio. They revamped their developmental system to make it the best one in the business by far and have scoured the independent scene for good talent with wrestling experience instead of mainly focusing on College athletes.
And yet, I still didn't see anything special from Seth Rolling, and Antonio Cesaro (who is a great wrestler) is going to lose his belt to someone like The Miz, just so the WWE can shove Ric Flair down our throats. Alberto Del Rio has a poor run as a champion, and it is all set for him to lose to Jack "Weed The People" Swagger.
Gimmicks are important because every wrestler needs a character that they can work, not every wrestler can work the same gimmick but the only way to find out the correct gimmick is to experiment, which is what they do on NXT. 2012 and 2013 have seen the return of more clear cut gimmicks anyways. Your statement that a gimmick doesn't matter is in my opinion Asinine since it is obvious that it does, prime example being Bray Wyatt, the former Husky Harris didn't really get over as Husky but once he made the switch to Bray he became so much greater. Some guys don't need a character and prefer working with character traits instead (Justin Gabriel, Tyson Kidd, The Miz and Dolph Ziggler etc) whilst others prefer working in a character (Undertaker, Bray Wyatt, Damian Sandow and Kane to name a few).
Husky Harris? That's the example you give me? Justin Gabriel and Tyson Kidd do NOTHING at all to me. I don't even think there's any appeal in this two guys. Dolph Ziggler soon to turn face, and obviously become stale.
Your statement that WWE doesn't care about wrestling is also one I don't see how you can argue for. WWE puts out 7 and a half hours of wrestling a week. They obviously do care about a business that they helped bring into the mainstream. They don't hype social media more than any other media company. It's the culture of our society and age.
You forgetting the bunch of commercials they shove down our throats. In a 3 hour show, you have 2 hours of commercials and fillers and only 1 hour of wrestling. So your argument is invalid. The fact that the WWE tries not to show the wrestlers own entrance is even more pathetic. The fact that Michael Cole and Jerry Lawler start talking about Tout in the middle of a match, shows very much how the WWE cares about wrestling.