Seabs said:Why not exactly? If he's always mentioned on TV and has a minimum of 2 live appearances a month its fine. Plus he'll bring mainstream exposure whilst managing to be entertaining and make me mark like a bitch when he wins it.
BaraaKhalaf92 said:NO AND HELL NO...
Its just stupid imo to end the longest reign in RAW history by a part timer who won't benefit from it....
They should give that momentum to a rising star, a future top star like Daniel Bryan or even Ryback.....
Seabs said:He won't benefit from it agreed but the company will, it's a similar reason I don't care if Orton or Cena win it again either there is logic to it plus I'm a huge Rock mark from being a kid so ill love to see him win it 1 more time.
BaraaKhalaf92 said:The company won't benefit from it in THE LONG RUN...
Seabs said:Why not? Say Rock didn't face Cena but Punk over instead? Or people tuned in to see Rock with the belt, saw Ryback tearing it up and thought wow this guy is awesome... Its all hypothetical admittedly but is more people interested in your product a bad thing?
Stopspot said:What this man says is true. Having Rock win it can and most likely will benefit the company in the long run. Just not in the way people usually think.
Seabs said:Not going to lie I was one of the guys for ages but I think it was KevinLockard23 who made me think of it this way an indirect positive.