- Joined
- Dec 16, 2011
- Messages
- 63,815
- Reaction score
- 6,080
- Points
- 1
- Location
- United Kingdom of Ambrose
- Website
- wweforums.net
They obviously don't see Bryan as a money-maker most probably because of his size and look, but everything they want in a superstar - reliable, over as fuck, company guy etc., - Bryan has. He literally is the perfect superstar if you disregard his look and height perhaps (in WWE's eyes of course). Do you agree that if they pushed Bryan to the moon and had him win the title in the way all of us thought he should have won it this year that he would be a money-maker for WWE and would bring in ratings?
I think what most people don't realise is how important merchandise sales are. The main appeal to a superstar that is over is whoring merchandise that you can get kids and the like to buy in STACKS that makes WWE a lot of money. The proof is with Ryder; pushing him was not an option, but whoring merchandise to his loyal fans was.
Do you, like WWE, agree that superstars like Cena, Orton, and Batista are the money-makers in WWE that should be pushed, or do you think Bryan can make WWE money like those stars can?
Discuss.
I think what most people don't realise is how important merchandise sales are. The main appeal to a superstar that is over is whoring merchandise that you can get kids and the like to buy in STACKS that makes WWE a lot of money. The proof is with Ryder; pushing him was not an option, but whoring merchandise to his loyal fans was.
Do you, like WWE, agree that superstars like Cena, Orton, and Batista are the money-makers in WWE that should be pushed, or do you think Bryan can make WWE money like those stars can?
Discuss.