Death on the Nile [A Detective Adventure Part II]

[Smart Marx]

I mean you’re talking about your general attitudes towards hosting so I would imagine anyone that is one of the modkilled because they can’t make as many posts as other people probably aren’t gonna sign up to it.

But I assume that’s your general goal though. You don’t want the inactive players playing so I get it makes sense.

 

[Ekkologix]

Just because they posted 130 times doesn't mean they can leave the game and not get modkilled...
Host was going to kill anyone that had not posted that phase.
Wang was purposely inactive scum so he posted.

she only left for one cycle...

then why not modkill cp holt and phenom who have not posted for more than 1 cycle

why was there an urgency to modkill junk instead of waiting for subs?

 

[Smart Marx]

@Ekkologix I will say unrelated to anything going on here and now, I doubt you’ll fill 23 player slots.

Might want to consider at least 16-18 instead.

 

[T-Pein™]

she only left for one cycle...

Yes and?

 

[Ekkologix]

I mean you’re talking about your general attitudes towards hosting so I would imagine anyone that is one of the modkilled because they can’t make as many posts as other people probably aren’t gonna sign up to it.

But I assume that’s your general goal though. You don’t want the inactive players playing so I get it makes sense.

i likely wont modkill right off the bat. ill give town a lynch against inactive players if there is too much inactivity mid game

 

[T-Pein™]

then why not modkill cp holt and phenom who have not posted for more than 1 cycle

These people got repped in.

 

[Smart Marx]

she only left for one cycle...

then why not modkill cp holt and phenom who have not posted for more than 1 cycle

why was there an urgency to modkill junk instead of waiting for subs?

I can’t remember when that happened, but if it was later, it’s because y’all were already whining about modkills.

When hosts feel like people are complaining, and get frustrated, they tend to rush to stop the noise. They make choices the otherwise wouldn’t have made.

This is what I keep telling you. You can either advocate for modkills or advocate for not modkilling but you can’t advocate for some modkills and then say but not those modkills. You’re not the host. Once you suggest a course of action for situations, that’s her discretion now.

This is why it’s always been an unwritten rule here that players don’t talk about reps and modkills midgame.

 

[Ekkologix]

@Ekkologix I will say unrelated to anything going on here and now, I doubt you’ll fill 23 player slots.

Might want to consider at least 16-18 instead.

yeah it probably wont fill

im hosting it on another site as we speak. 23 is a little too many players to ask for rn. its more fit for christmas game

 

[Ekkologix]

Yes and?

why wud u modkill someone inactive for 1 cycle with 130 posts and not modkill someone inactive for more than 1 cycle with 0 posts

u okay tea?

 

[Ekkologix]

These people got repped in.

thats fine

was it urgent to modkill junk? could host not have waited for reps?

 

[CakeWalker]

@Ekkologix I will say unrelated to anything going on here and now, I doubt you’ll fill 23 player slots.

Might want to consider at least 16-18 instead.

game is never going to fill to be honest.
a lot of players clearly personally don't enjoy your attitude. and i was happy to play. but being called a cheater underhanded "unintentionally" is just a big no from me. means i have no faith - that you won't try and screw me over.

 

[Ekkologix]

I can’t remember when that happened, but if it was later, it’s because y’all were already whining about modkills.

When hosts feel like people are complaining, and get frustrated, they tend to rush to stop the noise. They make choices the otherwise wouldn’t have made.

This is what I keep telling you. You can either advocate for modkills or advocate for not modkilling but you can’t advocate for some modkills and then say but not those modkills. You’re not the host. Once you suggest a course of action for situations, that’s her discretion now.

This is why it’s always been an unwritten rule here that players don’t talk about reps and modkills midgame.

like i said nobody. absolutely nobody. said modkill junk

we asked for inactives to be modkilled. players with less posts than the host

 

[Smart Marx]

like i said nobody. absolutely nobody. said modkill junk

we asked for inactives to be modkilled. players with less posts than the host

That doesn’t matter. You don’t get to choose who.

 

[Ekkologix]

game is never going to fill to be honest.
a lot of players clearly personally don't enjoy your attitude. and i was happy to play. but being called a cheater underhanded "unintentionally" is just a big no from me. means i have no faith - that you won't try and screw me over.

whether u play or not is up to u, but i treat that game as completely unrelated to this one and i hold nothing againt the players personally. if u r worried i will screw u over u can already rest assured i will not

 

[Smart Marx]

There would be no point of a host if the players in the game got to choose who got punished and when and how they got punished. You’re not hosting. You’re playing.