Death on the Nile [A Detective Adventure Part II]

[CakeWalker]

whether u play or not is up to u, but i treat that game as completely unrelated to this one and i hold nothing againt the players personally. if u r worried i will screw u over u can already rest assured i will not

by your own words. maybe you will "unintentionally".

 

[Comrade Khan]

JuSt AdApT!

 

[Ekkologix]

That doesn’t matter. You don’t get to choose who.

no it matters. u dont just randomly throw modkills that are undeserved

what am i even arguing with here

is it okay to just randomly modkill jeff and abi?

 

[CakeWalker]

no one was "randomly" modkilled.
you can cut that shit.

 

[Ekkologix]

by your own words. maybe you will "unintentionally".

if i did and u feel like u r being screwed over u r free to call it out and ill make immediate adjustments to fix the game

the game is open setup so im basically just a machine that takes inputs and produce output. i will not interact with the players in anyway

 

[Smart Marx]

no it matters. u dont just randomly throw modkills that are undeserved

what am i even arguing with here

is it okay to just randomly modkill jeff and abi?

It’s not because I don’t advocate for modkills cause I think modkills are trash but you can’t advocate for modkills and then choose who gets to be modkilled you’re not the host. You advocate for or against and that’s it. The host has final discretion after that.

 

[Comrade Khan]

 

[CakeWalker]

THREE PLAYERS WERE GIVEN FINAL POST WARNINGS
THE REP BASIS, WAS FROM LEAST ACTIVE TO MOST.
REPPS ARE NOT DONE TO BENEFIT EITHER SIDE - BUT ARE DONE IN A CONSISTENT AND FAIR MANNER.
PELTON = 0 POSTS & HOLT =1 - WERE BOTH REPPED IN THE LAST FEW DAYS
THERE IS NO BIAS INVOLVED, NOR DO PLAYERS GET TO DECIDE ORDER OF PLAYER.
EVERY PLAYER IS ACTIVE IN THE LAST 24 HOURS.
​

 

[Ekkologix]

There would be no point of a host if the players in the game got to choose who got punished and when and how they got punished. You’re not hosting. You’re playing.

its common sense to modkill inactives, not players with 130 posts that r mia for a cycle over players with 0 posts that are mia for more than a cycle

there was just no urgency to modkill junk there over waiting for reps. anyway im just repeating myself now. we will never agree

 

[CakeWalker]

@Captain Holt
@Wangman Page
@Junkette

this is your final activity bump

 

[CakeWalker]

DELETION COUNTDOWN

[done my best to find replacements - but once this countdown finishes, if repps aren't found both slots/player/s become active will be mod-killed to prevent further hinderances to the game]​

 

[Smart Marx]

I personally think modkills ruin games and haven’t done one outside behavioral issues since my very first game.

It’s called being logically consistent. Try it sometime.

 

[CakeWalker]

There was/is a priority order of repping inactive players out. Please stop asking for mod kills.

 

[Smart Marx]

its common sense to modkill inactives, not players with 130 posts that r mia for a cycle over players with 0 posts that are mia for more than a cycle

there was just no urgency to modkill junk there over waiting for reps. anyway im just repeating myself now. we will never agree

We won’t because you think you can host from inside the game. You can’t advocate for something and then get mad because they didn’t make the same choice you would. To her Junk was inactive. She did what you wanted. You just didn’t want that inactive player killed.

You don’t get to make that choice point blank period.

 

[Ekkologix]

what i shud try is to learn to coexist in an environment with compeltely different rules

slowly but surely every game we learn something. ill get there eventually