I mentioned here that ekko makes posts/questions that don't go anywhere and don't think he's out of scum range
Then you backed up my point saying that he does the same. But that I'd already bodied it. (What this means is open to interpretation)
Then at the bottom you said you recall similar walls of text in his non-town game in Xmas? The similar obviously means he thinks he's doing the same thing this game. He's not talking about any other game here lol.
So now ekko is gonna question him on it as he obviously interpreted it the same way I did:
Perfectly reasonable to ask.
Lethal then backtracks and says there was nothing this game (yet) even though he's already said I bodied him and recalled 'similar' posts from a non-town game ekko had
My original statement which is being blown WAY out of proportion is that I was not, am not, and will not, be in the mood to cypher through walls of text that go nowhere and can be used as a distractionary device. I'm a lazy reader, so shorter bursts are nice. He asked for receipts from this game, there weren't any, so I referenced Xmas because it was a game where he used the walls of text posting style to distract and confuse town to walk towards a win. You could look at many of his former games to see the walls posts, but Xmas stuck out to me cos he beat me in that game. It's just my preference for posts, nothing more, nothing less. I'm certainly not going to hang the guy out to dry for it. I said I wasn't in the mood for his walls of text. I'm actually town leaning him. I'm not sure how I can provide receipts for something that had not yet happened.
I was happy that you'd 'bodied him' which in my mind is you making a succinct statement that summarised my thoughts in clear fashion on what he does (amking posts/questions that don't go anywhere). That's it. Fuck me for agreeing with something someone has said.
