Death on the Nile [A Detective Adventure Part II]

[Ekkologix]

What the fuck are you talking about? Tweets read on lethal had nothing to do with any of that, that was in response to me saying haza’s scum read on lethal was bad.
Again, you’re framing this conversation in a completely FALSE way by trying to relate it to tweet and make him look bad. Firstly, I NEVER said it was NAI, that’s just something you took from what I said. Second, it being NAI would actually make tweet look better, because he dismissed it as a non issue that doesn’t effect his town read. Yet you’re here using it to try and make him look bad. Gee wonder what your agenda is

what are YOU talking about? isnt this the whole basis of tweet's read. isnt this lethal's meta? tweet still town reads lethal for the meta, and lethal's sensitivity is part of his meta

can u break down what tweet is town reading lethal based off if its not this? what is the lethal meta we r talking about here?

my question was not indicated to make tweet look better or worst, dont assign a motive to it. my question is clear. what makes tweet so confident on lethal being town?

 

[Poyser]

what are YOU talking about? isnt this the whole basis of tweet's read. isnt this lethal's meta? tweet still town reads lethal for the meta, and lethal's sensitivity is part of his meta

can u break down what tweet is town reading lethal based off if its not this? what is the lethal meta we r talking about here?

my question was not indicated to make tweet look better or worst, dont assign a motive to it. my question is clear. what makes tweet so confident on lethal being town?

No you’re the one trying to discredit the read, so why don’t you do that?

haza brought up the lethal “backtrack”. Tweet never mentioned it. Haza specifically asked him what he thought, tweet looked over it and said it doesn’t effect his read as he doesn’t even agree it was a backtrack in the first place. The point is totally independent of tweets read. It’s haza’s motives you should be looking to if you want to dissect the meta I’ve given you, as he’s the one that used it to read lethal as scum. Tweet never mentioned it and yet you keep trying to make it about him

as far as I’m aware tweet hasn’t explained his read of lethal other than to say it’s based on meta that in his experience has been 95% accurate.

and I will absolutely assign motive to all of your actions, that is the essence of mafia. You were trying to make tweet look bad, that is a fact and not disputable. The fact you are trying to deny it despite thinking tweet is scum is odd if anything

 

[Ekkologix]

and you are obsessed with shielding tpein, it’s self evident. You spent hours arguing with Jeff and discrediting everything jeff said about tpein, you keep repeating that Jeff has no merit unless he lays out a case that abides by your criteria which is nonsense. Just now you used lethal to bring up tpein and try to deflect even more attention away from him despite tpein not being related to that interaction in any way whatsoever. Your number 1 goal since I started playing this game has been to protect tpein. You haven’t put anywhere near as much time into trying to accomplish anything else as much as you have into discrediting anyone that’s trying to push tpein

all this whilst saying you think tpein might be scum as he’s not showing the fire you’d expect. But then he’s probably still town. Hmmm. You’d think you’d only put that amount of effort into defending someone you were at least 90% sure was town. Yet you don’t seem sure at all. Funny that

i am confident in my ability to read tpein as the game goes, i am okay with him staying for now. as i said multiple times id be willing to push him and help jeff when the time comes if i feel its right. if jeff wants to continue his push he'd need a better case imo

also tpein is fully capable of defending himself on his own, he certainly does not need me to make potato fries out of jeff's non existent arguments for him. its the one thing making me not very happy with tpein. i expected him to completely rekt jeff's arguments there and he didnt

lastly the wagons day 1 were between tpein and junk. from my PoV junk lynch was better so i had to ask jeff for why he wants tpein lynch first even tho he was fine with a junk lynch, and this discussion continued till the night. i had read tpein completely towny back then. only after tpeins tame replies to jeff i am starting to have some doubts

 

[Ekkologix]

the reason why i am involved in the tpein/jeff discussion is i was the one who asked jeff why he wanted to lynch tpein first instead of junk

 

[Poyser]

I’ve been playing with tpein for over a year now and I have never once in my life seen him “rek” anyones arguments, whether their arguments were good or bad. Where on earth do you get that expectation from?

 

[Poyser]

the reason why i am involved in the tpein/jeff discussion is i was the one who asked jeff why he wanted to lynch tpein first instead of junk

It’s not just that tho is it, as you then tried to make the lethal thing about lethal looking worse than tpein. It was a very specific point you made that wasn’t about Jeff.

 

[Ekkologix]

No you’re the one trying to discredit the read, so why don’t you do that?

oh yeah the meta read is absolutely garbage and deserves to be discredited, specially if i do not town read tweet. was that ur concern all along? heck yeah im discrediting that shit. i dont believe in meta reads

haza brought up the lethal “backtrack”. Tweet never mentioned it. Haza specifically asked him what he thought, tweet looked over it and said it doesn’t effect his read as he doesn’t even agree it was a backtrack in the first place. The point is totally independent of tweets read. It’s haza’s motives you should be looking to if you want to dissect the meta I’ve given you, as he’s the one that used it to read lethal as scum. Tweet never mentioned it and yet you keep trying to make it about him

where is the backtrack coming from? u were discussing lethal's sensitivity not the backtrack. the backtrack came afterwards and i am fully aware the backtrack came after tweet's read. u changing the goal post here

 

[Ekkologix]

as far as I’m aware tweet hasn’t explained his read of lethal other than to say it’s based on meta that in his experience has been 95% accurate.

okay so we r literally done here
the sensitivity part is part of lethal's meta. can u argue otherwise?

and I will absolutely assign motive to all of your actions, that is the essence of mafia. You were trying to make tweet look bad, that is a fact and not disputable. The fact you are trying to deny it despite thinking tweet is scum is odd if anything

those r motives u assign then, not motives i assign. u cant hold me to motives u assign

i do think tweet has a decent chance of being scum, i am not making him look bad, i am asking a simple why is he confidently town reading lethal question and u clearly fail to give me an answer for it as seen by the quote above

now shud i blame u for it? no.. because its tweet's job to give that answer not u

 

[Ekkologix]

tweet is a null/scum read of mine, therefore i must approach him with more scrutiny and ask how is he confident that lethal is town?

this is not making him look bad, this is solving his slot and asking real questions, and i do hope to get a satisfying answer thats not just "lol meta"

 

[Ekkologix]

on the contrary, you are trying to make my questions look bad when they r plain neutral questions just to obtain an answer / more information on a particular topic

 

[Ace Marvel]

4 am for me and night should be over.

Whats the point of ending nights at this hour.

anyways if I survive the night I have a claim.

upupupupu

 

[Ace Marvel]

I see Ekko continues to invalidate everyone that doesn’t agree 100% with them.

fun times

 

[Ekkologix]

It’s not just that tho is it, as you then tried to make the lethal thing about lethal looking worse than tpein. It was a very specific point you made that wasn’t about Jeff.

please tell me where i said lethal is worst than tpein, the post straight up says "just as bad"
i am no native english speaker but this clearly implies equally as bad, NOT lethal is worst. ands this is strictly speaking about their weak/soft/no fire replies.

nice we can policy lynch him again until he starts playing genuine then wooo

lethal's replies to haza btw is just as bad as tpeins replies to jeff if u follow the same metric or dismissive weak sauce no fire replies

 

[Ekkologix]

I see Ekko continues to invalidate everyone that doesn’t agree 100% with them.

fun times

thats the only thing u come out with in this interaction?

 

[Ekkologix]

4 am for me and night should be over.

Whats the point of ending nights at this hour.

anyways if I survive the night I have a claim.

upupupupu

yeah almost 5 i shud head to sleep

we'll continue tomorow if we r both alive @Poyser