I have finally caught up.q
Ace is likely to make that first post as either alignment so I'm not sure why exactly it would be prudent to just base your entire road off that very first post. Perhaps if you combined it in conjunction with the rest of his posts? That said, Ace's posts have felt pretty NAI to me and vague. He's offered a town lean thus far on me and nothing else.
I think it's a good chance that Smark and Poyser are both town/town (God help us all if another argument starts between them) and have differing philosophies on Ace's style of play. Not interested in voting either of them for now. Poyser has been brazen, unflinching, and full of fire. I feel that's a good sign he's town. As for Smark, he's talking, and talking, and talking, and really just debating without any semblance of backing down. That is also a good sign in my opinion.
As for Doddsy atm, no real read on him yet. Not sure if him agreeing with Smark is genuine or good-guying. May have to watch his posts close from now on.
Then we get to Banez who I think has looked pretty bad out of this exchange. How do I put this-- Banez hasn't had his usual bite. He seems more like walking on egg shells and just tip-toeing around certain subjects or just ignoring them entirely to look as if he's fitting in. He gives Poyser a town read despite by his own admission wanting a TL/DR of the debate between the two (which was not a good debate to go through btw).
So where do we go from here?
I agree and will join the Banez wagon.
Unvote
Vote: Banez