I enjoy Stardust's character and I thought the addition of the Ascension was cool. Maybe they'll actually get some meaningful appearances now - wins or loses. I'm kind of tired of the "hissing like a cat" Stardust does. That's my one complaint.
Literally three posts above yours I stated how much I love it.I'm apparently alone in this, but I'm highly entertained by the Stardust character. The addition of the Ascension may mean something and it may comes to nothing (basing anything on the results of a Superstars match is...well....silly).
I worried (and still worry, to be fair) that Cody Rhodes as Stardust will win just as many and just as important titles as Cody Rhodes as....Cody Rhodes. But, in all fairness, Cody Rhodes doesn't get a semi-important match at Summerslam with Stephen Amell and Cody Rhodes doesn't get back-up from anybody, much less a more serious (at least I hope they're more serious) Ascension. Stardust gets these things because the character is a comic book villain, which gets more of a reaction than any other character Cody Rhodes has played in recent memory.
Look, Cody likes weird characters (anybody remember "Dashing" Cody Rhodes or "Thinks He's Hideous" Cody Rhodes?). Stardust is as far as he's taken this, but at least he's entertaining.
And I also figure I'm just not getting that he's exactly like Goldust. Similar? Okay. Identical? No.
wk
I love all the random weirdness honestly. He is more Joker (cartoon version) than a Golddust (not that you claimed that) and I like that. He is chaos in the WWE, and eventually if built right could play out greatly. I still want Golddust vs Stardust, but I want no face, and no heel. Anti-hero and villain, you decide which is which.I enjoy Stardust's character and I thought the addition of the Ascension was cool. Maybe they'll actually get some meaningful appearances now - wins or loses. I'm kind of tired of the "hissing like a cat" Stardust does. That's my one complaint.
The question really has to be: is that a bad thing? Are you not entertained fella?Cosmic Jobbers. Nothing special will come of these.
....are you @Nice Person 's alter egoStardust has potential, much like other superstars do.... But, he will continue to job until the cosmos align.
Literally three posts above yours I stated how much I love it.
Cody Rhodes tells fantastic stories while wrestling as Cody Rhodes. He put on great matches routinely as 'Dashing', 'Un-Dashing' and 'Un-sure what his gimmick is' Rhodes. He doesn't need a lame rip-off gimmick to make him interesting.And normal, bland Cody Rhodes is any better how?
Cody Rhodes tells fantastic stories while wrestling as Cody Rhodes. He put on great matches routinely as 'Dashing', 'Un-Dashing' and 'Un-sure what his gimmick is' Rhodes. He doesn't need a lame rip-off gimmick to make him interesting.
Dashing Cody Rhodes, wasn't a character like Stardust, and he put on great matches with Rey Mysterio, Jack Swagger and Kofi Kingston during his time as Dashing Cody Rhodes in 2010. He was a midcard staple for SmackDown. Counted on to put on great matches.
Un-Dashing Cody Rhodes, once again wasn't like Stardust, and this put Rhodes in Apex mode. Some of the great matches and rivalries of his career are from this era. He single handedly made Ted Dibiase a viable face, and got him a following. Was probably the only one who put on a good feud with Big Zeke, and did great stuff with Intercontinental Championship. He was one of the few people since 2005 to do something great with it.
Cody Rhodes doesn't need to be Stardust, something toned down would do just fine. I'm not saying leave him in the same state as Cody Rhodes 2014, but don't waste his great in-ring talents with a shitty gimmick. imo at least.
Waiting for the matchof the Centuary, Mark Henry VS Arnold Stang..My fault. I see you are right.
wk