- Joined
- Mar 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,334
- Reaction score
- 1,703
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 37
Dean shouldn't be the guy to make Brock seem vincible
He's the "Lunatic Fringe" and he can use pretty any weapon he wants to, of course he should of. He already made Brock seem vincible once when he blasted him with a steel chair so many times the month before at Fast Lane that Lesnar couldn't make it back in the ring to break up the pinfall in time. Reigns, Taker, and the Wyatt Family have all made Brock seem "mortal" before already as well.
I wonder where Lesnar goes from here. They put this guy over so incredibly strong in 2014 to put Reigns over but you know the rest of that story. Now it's 2016, The Beast Incarnate is still invincible, but who are they going to put over him?
I assume they'll revisit Brock vs Bray Wyatt later on down the road in the Summer. I doubt the Wyatts attacking the LON was intended to be a face turn per se (although I didn't watch Smackdown, so I don't know how they followed up on it), so Heyman could address the issue Brock still has with the Wyatt Family when he returns seeing as how he would be WWE Champion right now if it wasn't for them (in Heyman's mind, of course.)
I'm sure Reigns is still the one favored to conquer The Beast when the time is right, but I don't ever see the time being right with that one. In the end, Brock's first loss post-Streak will probably disappointingly be at the hands of a part-timer or established star that doesn't need it and won't benefit from it. That's how these sort of things nearly always pan out, unfortunately. The Rock ended Punk's 434 day title reign, Cena ended Rusev and Bray's undefeated streaks, Lesnar ended The Undertaker's WM streak, Del Rio was the first to successfully answer John Cena's Open Challenge cleanly, etc.