Who wins though? Right now, I think Lesnar will retain. Roman will win the title at WrestleMania.
If not Lesnar, then it has to be Strowman. What do you think?
Firstly, what a match this could be...carnage if they allow it.
Who wins though? Right now, I think Lesnar will retain. Roman will win the title at WrestleMania.
If not Lesnar, then it has to be Strowman. What do you think?
Firstly, what a match this could be...carnage if they allow it.
So...from what I have read/heard the WWE wants the Universal title on
RAW every week...and Lesnar can't/won't/isn't paid enough to do that.
So I believe they will put the belt on Joe at Summerslam and have him
hold it till the Royal Rumble next year when he drops it back to Lesnar.
Reigns wins the Royal Rumble
Which is why the WWE would consider doing it...Considering the Rumble is back in Philly, I'd be shocked if they even consider (let alone go ahead with it) having Reigns win the Rumble. Lord knows how that went last time...
Yeah...but I can't see Vince passing up on the opportunity to makeThe way I see it, Roman wouldn't have to win the Rumble in order to have a one on one with Lesnar for the title and, quite frankly, WWE already planted those seeds with Paul Heyman's promo the very night after this years Mania, when he talked about the only two individuals to ever beat Undertaker at Wrestlemania. If you needed a reason, there you have it...
A cool and dramatic idea...but I don't think the Undertaker's new hips would allow it...My little fantasy thinking: WWE go ahead with their plan, the match between Reigns and Lesnar happens, Reigns wins the match, becomes Universal Champion and then, while celebrating...lights out....DONG !!!!.........lights back on...DONG !!!! Undertaker is in the ring....Chokeslam....Badass setup for Summerslam 2018....
Which do you find more interesting...Universal title "feud" or the World title "feud"?There will be a Roman vs Brock stand off, and it will all culminate in Wrestlemania. Can't say I care much about the storyline/title/WWE at this point in general though :emoji_stuck_out_tongue:
I have no idea who is going after world title but it cant be worse than UT XDWhich do find more interesting...Universal title "feud" or the World title "feud"?
Which do find more interesting...Universal title "feud" or the World title "feud"?
That's a fair call...To me, the Universal title still seems like a consolation prize. Sure, it's a major title but it has no significant title lineage. The WWE World Championship can have it's lineage traced back to the NWA title. Technically it's the title that Vince J McMahon and Toots Mondt created in 1963 just with a different name. The Universal has been around about a year and really doesn't mean much yet, in my view. That's why the whole Roman Reigns/Lesnar thing for the Universal title doesn't bug me as much because in my view, it's the secondary title in WWE.