SummerSlam Brock and taker - Kane

[The GOAT]

QUOTE ="seabs, post: 992342, member: 17"]They do in modern WWE? Michaels played the defacto heel role in their feud also didn't he?[ QUOTE ]

No, he was still a babyface, he just showed a bit of desperation in his actions. But he was never presented by the commentators as a heel, and he sure as hell wasn't treated as one by the audiences.

Not every feud has to have some clearly defined 'Hero' and 'Villain' with no room for a grey area; Things are not always so black and white, even in WWE.

 

[Nice Person]

Taker won't turn Heel, the crowd is to behind him to beat Lesner into the next Galaxy. **But,** if Lesnar was being 'beat up' by Taker and tried to exit, *then* Kane could show up and block his way, forcing him back into the ring where Taker would demolish him, and after the 3 count, Kane would raise Taker's arm in victory and both would smile. Oh, and 'The Brothers of Destruction' would be back.........

 

[edge4ever]

"Slightly different circumstances. Cena did that post losing dirty to Rusev I'm guessing ( I don't really remember that shitfest of a feud too well) Brock beat Taker clean."

Well it was different, true. But, I think this shows a desperate taker. Like he will find a way to beat Brock. At no point has taker come out and made any sort of heel remark. He just took a cheap shot on Brock to gain the upper hand. I think it shows more or less that he will do whatever it takes to prove he can beat Brock, not so much turning a heel.