SummerSlam Brock and taker - Kane

[seabs]

Not a mask, THAT mask.... or :gtfo:

If he uses slow chemical I'd be impressed. Oddly enough I'm kind of disappointed Brock / Taker isn't a hell in a cell if this is the story they want to tell. It would have been a nice circular narrative.

 

[edge4ever]

If he uses slow chemical I'd be impressed. Oddly enough I'm kind of disappointed Brock / Taker isn't a hell in a cell if this is the story they want to tell. It would have been a nice circular narrative.

True but they've already done that match

 

[Prince Bálor]

I'd only want to see this so it can be a Handicap match at WrestleMania, with both their careers on the line

I agree 110%. Perfect idea.

 

[seabs]

True but they've already done that match

Yeah like 10 years ago lol.

 

[Zany Clowny]

I still root for Kane, man. I don't give a fuck about his age if he's in a high profile storyline it can turn out good. I remember a few years ago he was in a terrible feud with Edge, but they still had good matches. It's so predictable, to me that's why I don't want this to happen. If it does, I'd like either old Kane with the first mask, or this Kane:

Please WWE, if you go down this route, which you really shouldn't, at least realize that and not drop the ball on some fresh off the grill Kane momentum.

 

[The GOAT]

This would be pretty predictable if it happens, and I'm sincerely hope it doesn't. Kane should just return and target Seth Rollins instead. Trying to protect Seth at the behest of The Authority is the only reason he and Lesnar ever crossed paths to begin with.

My gut tells me that Sting might actually interfere and cost Taker the match at Summerslam instead.

 

[edge4ever]

Yeah like 10 years ago lol.

How about 3 stages of hell instead? Lol

 

[edge4ever]

This would be pretty predictable if it happens, and I'm sincerely hope it doesn't. Kane should just return and target Seth Rollins instead. Trying to protect Seth at the behest of The Authority is the only reason he and Lesnar ever crossed paths to begin with.

My gut tells me that Sting might actually interfere and cost Taker the match at Summerslam instead.

I would not see sting doing this and turning heel

 

[C.M. Shaddix]

Kane has been around for so long now he has lost my interest... please no, don't do this shit to Lesnar and Taker

 

[seabs]

I would not see sting doing this and turning heel

Isn't Taker the heel technicality in this match? If so Sting could play the injustice angle from Taker costing Brock the title at battleground.

 

[edge4ever]

Isn't Taker the heel technicality in this match? If so Sting could play the injustice angle from Taker costing Brock the title at battleground.

Well I don't think that's the case. Taker still seems to be a face to me. He's simply resorting to a low blow just to ensure that he keeps lesnar at bay... The first time he just tried to choke slam him at battleground, he almost got F5ed

 

[seabs]

Well I don't think that's the case. Taker still seems to be a face to me. He's simply resorting to a low blow just to ensure that he keeps lesnar at bay... The first time he just tried to choke slam him at battleground, he almost got F5ed

Low blows aren't a very babyface action,neither is cheap shotting a recently turned face and costing him the title against a top heel.

 

[The GOAT]

Low blows aren't a very babyface action,neither is cheap shotting a recently turned face and costing him the title against a top heel.

Depends on the circumstances. Babyfaces have given cheap shots and low-blows before without in any way turning heel. Faces have a long history of sometimes toeing the line between what is generally considered 'acceptable' and 'unacceptable' actions.

As far as the Undertaker is concerned, let's not forget that Michaels cost him his championship against Jericho at the 2010 Elimination Chamber PPV all because he wanted to goad Taker into giving him a rematch at Wrestlemania. That was hardly the most noble action in the world (and neither was him superkicking a couple of referees a month before just because he was so strung out over losing the Rumble match), but that wasn't an official heel turn either.

 

[edge4ever]

Low blows aren't a very babyface action,neither is cheap shotting a recently turned face and costing him the title against a top heel.

Well cena attacked rusev and choked him out until he agreed to a match... Cena is the top face, not very face like.

If taker came out the next night on raw after battleground and said he hates the wwe universe and fights for himself and will bring Brock and everyone down... Then that's different

 

[seabs]

Well cena attacked rusev and choked him out until he agreed to a match... Cena is the top face, not very face like.

If taker came out the next night on raw after battleground and said he hates the wwe universe and fights for himself and will bring Brock and everyone down... Then that's different

Slightly different circumstances. Cena did that post losing dirty to Rusev I'm guessing ( I don't really remember that shitfest of a feud too well) Brock beat Taker clean.

Depends on the circumstances. Babyfaces have given cheap shots and low-blows before without in any way turning heel. Faces have a long history of sometimes toeing the line between what is generally considered 'acceptable' and 'unacceptable' actions.

As far as the Undertaker is concerned, let's not forget that Michaels cost him his championship against Jericho at the 2010 Elimination Chamber PPV all because he wanted to goad Taker into giving him a rematch at Wrestlemania. That was hardly the most noble action in the world (and neither was him superkicking a couple of referees a month before just because he was so strung out over losing the Rumble match), but that wasn't an official heel turn either.

They do in modern WWE? Michaels played the defacto heel role in their feud also didn't he?