No, Slim. It's "appalling" to be an apologist for a murderer. To me, to say "I don't love what he did but I love him for who he was" is "appalling." Obviously, I'm not quoting YOU here, but that's the sentiment that drives me crazy.
Congratulations for falling for my "ignorant" comment. Yes, I made an intentionally ignorant comment because I knew someone would say "Hey that's fucking dumb!" or something to that extent. I think it's pretty damn "ignorant" to give a murderer an excuse as to why his actions are acceptable or forgivable. Of course, no one with the opinion contrary to mine would ever ADMIT they're forgiving him and accepting what he did, but that's exactly what they're fucking doing. It's a disservice to Nancy and Daniel. It's repugnant.
I can confirm 100% that he did not, in fact, have full mental capacity when he murdered his wife and child. People with full mental capacity don't murder their wife and child. Research into Concussion trauma is in such an infantile state (much more so in 2007) that to just give a blanket excuse of "his brain was mush" is, for lack of a better word "ignorant."
Oh, and I can watch Benoit matches. I don't go out of my way. The guy was overrated. True story.