If DiBiase had any say in on what theme he should use, which I think he did, he should continue to be buried into obscurity. Fuck him. You have like three good themes you can use and you choose some smurf 'hip-hop', R&B, auto-tune piece of shit.
DiBiase was never good. He was better than Rhodes when he debuted but Rhodes has improved more than anyone else in the company in the last few years and DiBiase has always gone downhill. He was boring in Legacy and what gimmick he could have in singles competition has never been properly utilized. Also he never really got over well.
If DiBiase had any say in on what theme he should use, which I think he did, he should continue to be buried into obscurity. Fuck him. You have like three good themes you can use and you choose some smurf 'hip-hop', R&B, auto-tune piece of shit.
"Sex_Power said:When something is pretty much better than another thing in almost every single way and you favour it, then I'm pretty sure it's not being biased.
Guess you got out debated.
If DiBiase had any say in on what theme he should use, which I think he did, he should continue to be buried into obscurity. Fuck him. You have like three good themes you can use and you choose some smurf 'hip-hop', R&B, auto-tune piece of shit.
LOL... Quite.
By you? ...In this thread? ...Hardly!!!
I just chose not to clutter the board up repetition.
Not ONE single point I've seen you raise here has stood up to even mild debate.
As for your further ramblings about Dibiase and such in the tail end of this thread... Seriously, just stfu.... You're embarrassing yourself by citing 2nd and 3rd hand opinions about a show you say you don't watch.
You see, you say you don't need to watch TV to keep up with the product, yet the inaccuracies and straight up wrong-ness of your posts PROVE otherwise.
As for my opinion of myself... Don't see where that comes into any of my posts in either of these on-going debates with you). This is about our individual assesments of the finer points of a TV show which one of us watches, whilst the other doesn't.
Friendly advice: I'd just put me on ignore, cos there's nothing that makes it to the top of my 'shit list' quicker than a smark who repeatedly criticises a show without actually watching it.
Hardy having a major heel run and getting over as a heel,
Sooo I made the mistake of watching TNA tonight. It's so painful to watch. They can't even get heels and faces right anymore, and when you are pushing Matt Morgan as a top star your promotion is in trouble. It doesn't even feel like a wrestling show anymore. It's a 20 minute Immortal / Fortune promo to start the show every week, and every time it's practically pointless. The Joe vs. Pope feud is just too typical. It's getting harder and harder to defend the product, and find something positive in this mess of an organization. This could even be worse than the late WCW days.
Where's the proof that Hardy having a "major" heel run is a positive thing for TNA? Sure, he's getting loud heel reactions in the iMPACT Zone but those are, in all honesty, conditioned fans who go along with what TNA does for the most part. On the road though he's still getting face reactions. And house show business has actually decreased since his turn. It's been months since his turn and people are still confused. TNA managed to take a proven draw and ruin it.
As for the DiBiase debate - the guy is a joke. I get reading results and being able to follow storylines but those don't give you the ins and outs, how someone's match came off, how someone's promo looked, etc. If you've actually been watching DiBiase's promos, how can you really say they're any good? He always sounds overly rehearsed and I'm just never convinced he means anything he's saying. He has nowhere near the presence his father did. It's like he's not even into his gimmick. He couldn't even make it look like he was actually attracted to Maryse. Ted certainly looked like he had potential when he debuted but, since then, he hasn't shown much progression or improvement IMO.