Are the "goldberg" chants really a bad thing?

[Leo C]

Exactly my point, there's no point. It only makes things worse. WWE can't book.

 

[Lockard 23]

Brock/Triple H is not pointless. It's a big match that we haven't seen before (we should have seen it 9-10 years ago, but I guess Triple H didn't want to help put over Brock back then) but now we get to. This whole angle with Lesnar and Heyman suing Triple H seems a bit silly but it started off really well with Lesnar breaking Triple H's arm. Of course if it ends with Triple H on top, that would be counterproductive since Brock losing his second match (after already losing his first match) would kill him dead. But the feud and match itself can be great. Not absolutely everything should be about just putting over the younger stars.

And Brock/Rhodes? Seriously? I seriously, seriously doubt we'll even see Brock/Bryan. Unless it ends up as the new version of Diesel/Backlund all over again.

 

[Leo C]

I agree that the feud and the match can be great. But the problem is that HHH isn't even on the active roster and Lesnar has limited appearances, I'm not sure this is the best way to use him. I don't think Lesnar vs Rhodes is the best idea... Lesnar vs Bryan I'd like to see.

PS: It was stupid to put Diesel over Backlund that way. WWE was horrible during 1995, Backlund as champ could've helped it.

 

[BrockLesnarFanForLife]

It just shows Ryback is a Goldberg wannabe

 

[Donald Trump_]

It just shows Ryback is a Goldberg wannabe

Often imitated, but never duplicated.

 

[Crayo]

He'as not a wannabe at all. I prefer Ryback over Goldberg.

 

[Donald Trump_]

He'as not a wannabe at all. I prefer Ryback over Goldberg.

:shock::facepalm1: