I'm not necessarily a fan of Cesaro, but what irks me about all this is the logic (or rather lack of) behind all this. As far as Cesaro goes, despite a horrible gimmick, I never really got the impression that the guy is horrible or necessarily "boring" past his character. If anything, first and foremost that's WWE's fault for not actually giving him something worthwhile to actually work with and that plays to his possible strengths (I wouldn't know what they are but this certainly doesn't do that). And it's not just Cesaro, it's such a common crappy excuse - that's my main problem with this.
It's basically in-line with what WWE officials always seem to think - it's always the fault of the talent and NOT their own terrible methods. And for that matter, labeling someone "boring" when it's their own damn fault for making them so damn boring in the first place?! There's a difference between the gimmick being boring, and the man himself just being boring in general. It's a bit hard to come to the conclusion that it's the latter when they've done so little. That kind of crap seriously just need to stop.
Like I said, i'm not a huge fan of the guy (and it's kind of hard to be), but I see no reason that they shouldn't try something else with the guy instead - I at least believe it's a stupid and annoying waste to just "label him boring" and demote him the way they have - that's just ridiculous.