Okay, let's use the Women's title as an example. We currently hold the title now, and we have some title matches on our show. But at PPVs, every match is RAW is COLE vs breakDOWN after you determine your Women's Championship #1 Contender, and since we don't want to have bias in our writing, the winner is chosen at random.
Really? I don't think that's how it should work. how about this? This month we have the womens rivalry and you have the tag belts rivalry since the champions can also jump brands then we swap each month
I don't like that idea for a few reasons. If we switch every month at PPVs, it'll be too predictable for readers. Also, our tag team division is very small, so until we get some new teams built up, I wouldn't want those belts on our RAW is COLE.
I'm sorry how is it predictable? Plus we have alot of tag teams. Alpha? Usos? The Club? And the champs will be able to be both on RAW is COLE and BreakDOWN like the original draft so it's fine.
How can you not see the predictability if we switch every single month?? It's clear that we would be establishing a pattern if we did this, ESPECIALLY if we're trading titles every PPV.
We want readers of our brand to enjoy it, but if they already know who's gonna win the match because of this pattern, they might not even read it. It'll take a few months, sure, but they'll catch on, and until our tag team division grows because we don't want to exhaust every possible tag team match and rivalry, we shouldn't be the face of the tag team division for either brand.
what pattern? they get a tag team championship rivalry one month and we get the tag team championship the next month
How do you think I feel? I have no idea what his point is!The original GM mode was better.
This is giving me a headache!
Well, here's the point I've tried to make three times. If we're exchanging those titles every month, people are going to know that we're swapping them every month. It needs to be randomized so there's no bias and there's no predictability involved.
we're not going to swap them. The tag team champions get a tag team from our brand as challengers one month. Then if whoever wins that match at the ppv, Scat's brand then get the tag team champions for one month. then we swap each month. We are not exchanging titles because like YOU said, they are on both brands. Okay?
How about instead of sharing the titles monthly. We trade at the end of the 2nd month ppv. Cause honestly I hate one month feuds and you can stretch out the #1 contender matches getting personal. I think I know what he means. He thinks we'll abuse our power and continue to change championship every month.. I think.
You can change the championship on your brand if you want, I have no issue with that. I just think we'd argue too much if we tried to come to a consensus on who gets the title when, which is why I believe it should be random.
When I say they're on both brands, I'm referring to the previous WWE brand splits when one tag team from another show could challenge on a PPV and take the title to their Brand. I don't know if I'm misinterpreting what you're saying, but what I'm reading is that we're trading off which brand gets the title every month. Maybe I'm wrong.
