Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    Reductio ad absurdum.
  2. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    You could. Though that would be pretty stupid. If you're that sensitive that you can't have your e-authority questioned I would recommend reassessing yourself. I'm just sayin'
  3. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    I see back pedaling! Why not say exactly what you meant? Why not say that you were shutting it down for flaming? Why oh why are you so full of shit?
  4. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    Interesting. I wasn't aware that a moderator got to deal in absolutes. You learn something new every day. Are you done feeling self important now?
  5. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    Well, right on. If that makes you happy then congratulations. Personally, I feel restrained. I miss having a section where I can say whatever the hell I want to with other consenting members. It's cathartic. However, I am doing my best to be a good little boy. Now, bringing this all back...
  6. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    I know that, it's not just me that I'm defending there though. And uhh, the less we say about the latter part of your post the better. I'd rather avoid rehashing but I was definitely what you would perceive to be the force of forum evil.
  7. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    Oops, forgot to respond to this part. The problem is that the warning came down and that was chill. Then it was shut down for no good reason. Nothing untoward whatsoever happened after the warning.
  8. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    I was looking for him to back up his statements. If he doesn't want to be called out on his bullshit then he shouldn't spout off said bullshit. That's fine. Different strokes for different folks and I can dig that in this case. Calling us trolls though is definitely a short cut to thinking...
  9. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    Actually IWF died after someone tried to take Hell in a Thread away from us. Many members left and then never came back. We got HiaT back eventually but at that point it was too late. If I was being civil afterwards how could I have possibly been an asshat?
  10. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    I would give my left nut for something like Hell in a Thread to be opened here. And naming and shaming works. It forces people to take responsibility for their decisions.
  11. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    For Christ's sake. I was warned. I stopped. Civil discussion began again and then it was shut down for discussing something that Hollywood didn't like. Seriously, his exact words for why he closed it down are quoted in my above post. It had nothing to do with flaming. Please try reading.
  12. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    And now I'm sad. There will never be another place like it. :(
  13. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    I believe in naming and shaming. Anybody who was on IWF while I was the Admin there knows that I don't do private anything. I do everything publicly. And I commented on Tapout because I think it's hilarious that he's supporting you on this when he blatantly insulted me in the one discussion...
  14. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    I put this here for that purpose.
  15. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    I guess it's okay for you to insult people?
  16. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    I'll cop to being aggressive, fine. However if you'll notice you made a comment asking to dial it back. That was at 6:18. At 6:31, less than 15 minutes later and after a couple of civil posts you closed the thread by saying this: And while you may not see value in discussion your opinion is...
  17. 420 Legalize it?

    This is true. There have been studies done indicating that the number 16 year olds who have tried weed in Amsterdam was drastically lower than 16 year olds in the US.
  18. Shutting down legitimate discussion

    http://wrestlingsmarks.com/forums/t67001-3/ Are you serious? Why would you close that? The topic was about the bombings. I wasn't aware that discussing the who and why was against the rules. If you don't like the discussion, fine. You don't have to, don't participate. Don't just shut it down...
  19. 2 explosions at the finish line of the Boston Marathon

    You're both wrong. They're Chechens. I'm still waiting on that evidence too.
  20. 2 explosions at the finish line of the Boston Marathon

    Offer up some proof that there was a cover up. So far we have you claiming incorrectly that they were Middle Eastern and that bomb squads being at a major event is some sort of strange occurrence. Got anything else?