I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
I like Edge and I'm glad he is back. But do I want to see WWE do what they always do with the past and have them become champion beating the current guys? Nah I'm beyond sick of it so I'm glad WWE has Roman win.
Expect the reign will have been cut short and Edge would have been the first to beat this Roman. So it would mean less and tbh signify what WWE always do: Have the past beat the present
Bryan winning would have been fine. Why does Edge need to be the one to beat Roman? If anything he should be used to put Roman over so he can put someone else over
Like what does Edge gain from beating Roman? Not a lot. What does Big E or Keith Lee gain from beating Roman who has taken down all challengers including Edge? A lot
Roman is at least from the current generation. Edge isn't. If you want make new stars, stop having the past always beat them and wonder why people only give a fuck about the old guys
And Edge has held the title 1000 times. He'll be fine without it. Have someone new beat Roman, not an old timer like always. About time WWE stopped having the past go over the present