I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
OK well you can live in a fantasy world where WWE would do that. End of the day, I don't think Edge needs or should win the title again and since he has creative control, it seems he agrees with me
Again though but why? Edge doesn't need the belt and tbh if you want to end the reign so badly put a new star over then. Don't book the old returning legend to do it
Why does a title reign need to end at Mania? If every reign ends at Mania it's too predictable. The story made sense to not end it at Mania. Edge needs the belt far less then Roman. Roman it helps with his head of the table character
Him having great stories like this and losing to Roman makes him far better than those returns and I also think Edge knows he is better off without the title
Goldberg did it twice, The Rock when he came back and ended Punk's reign for that god awful Cena match, HHH's rumble win (that was less bad but still hated that)
If you think that is what I meant you're missing the point. It's not an age thing. it's a constant fuck thec current stars lets always have the past win