"Lawyer Fucked Me" A Shawshank Redemption Mafia Game Presented By Barry (Game Thread)

[Poyser]

Not if it's pointlessly arbitrary. Sorry, try again.

If this is still the current votes AND it ends up being Juice then it's clear there's a mafia in the current train. I wonder who that may be?

Poyser (2) - Looch, R-Troop
Brett (1) - Lethal
Jean (1) - Brett
Juice (4) - Poyser, Smark, Sky, Jean
Lethal (1) - Juice

Wrong. Using your vote is how you put pressure on somebody and move the game forward. If nobody voted until they were “sure” then nothing would ever get done. Your point of view doesn’t even make any sense, you need over half the game to vote somebody to lynch them and you can change your vote within about 5 seconds, so why would voting anybody for any reason be a bad thing? How else do you expect to signal your intentions? How do you expect the person you’re throwing shade at to take you seriously if you won’t vote them? How do you expect town to find the difference between mafia who are distancing from each other and town/mafia that are going after each other if you don’t judge their intentions based on whether or not they were willing to vote or just talk?

 

[Poyser]

I always thought it was psychiatrist who turns the sk vanilla and town. FBI agent for one player with a hider claim is good for thought

?

 

[Poyser]

Sorry, that's also meant to mean if it ends up NOT being Juice (as in not mafia, obvs) then I'd be willing to be someone of those current 4 are mafia. Not necessarily more than one.

Your premise is faulty. There could be mafia on the wagon, sure. The idea that it’s “clear” isn’t really true. That’s up for you to judge. If you’re mafia and town are going to lynch a townie whether you get involved or not then why would you?

 

[Fuji Vice]

Wrong. Using your vote is how you put pressure on somebody and move the game forward. If nobody voted until they were “sure” then nothing would ever get done. Your point of view doesn’t even make any sense, you need over half the game to vote somebody to lynch them and you can change your vote within about 5 seconds, so why would voting anybody for any reason be a bad thing? How else do you expect to signal your intentions? How do you expect the person you’re throwing shade at to take you seriously if you won’t vote them? How do you expect town to find the difference between mafia who are distancing from each other and town/mafia that are going after each other if you don’t judge their intentions based on whether or not they were willing to vote or just talk?

Oy vey. LOL.

Your premise is faulty. There could be mafia on the wagon, sure. The idea that it’s “clear” isn’t really true. That’s up for you to judge. If you’re mafia and town are going to lynch a townie whether you get involved or not then why would you?

It's a figure of speech. My goodness.

So, on to other things, since I'm not wasting time arguing with people here, is anyone here aware of whether there's a modkill rule for inactivity and also if Juice is really going to stop playing? Because we obviously need to strongly consider just lynching Juice it they're going to be modkilled otherwise.

 

[Lethal]

?

Would both exist? 2 shot hider with an agent seems very idk, odd. Both being in game and on town seems an interesting choice.

 

[Lethal]

Oy vey. LOL.

It's a figure of speech. My goodness.

So, on to other things, since I'm not wasting time arguing with people here, is anyone here aware of whether there's a modkill rule for inactivity and also if Juice is really going to stop playing? Because we obviously need to strongly consider just lynching Juice it they're going to be modkilled otherwise.

You were absent for 30 hours. Lol at calling for modkill on activity

 

[Fuji Vice]

You were absent for 30 hours. Lol at calling for modkill on activity

You don't modkill someone BEFORE a single day is over.

In my experience it's generally on Day 3 of inactivity.

 

[Loochblade]

So, on to other things, since I'm not wasting time arguing with people here, is anyone here aware of whether there's a modkill rule for inactivity and also if Juice is really going to stop playing? Because we obviously need to strongly consider just lynching Juice it they're going to be modkilled otherwise.

According to the rules in the OP, no.

I have a feeling if Juice would somehow survive, he would continue to play, honestly.

 

[Fuji Vice]

According to the rules in the OP, no.

I have a feeling if Juice would somehow survive, he would continue to play, honestly.

Have you played with him before? Is this sort of behaviour normal?

 

[Comrade Khan]

Yeah no buys on the FBI agent claim lol

 

[Comrade Khan]

Have you played with him before? Is this sort of behaviour normal?

Yes

 

[Lethal]

You don't modkill someone BEFORE a single day is over.

In my experience it's generally on Day 3 of inactivity.

So why bring it up for Juice?

 

[Comrade Khan]

Lots of people here can be dramatic.

Lethal said he'd be done last game and he's already back lol

 

[Lethal]

Juice just ‘quitting’ out of frustration for the day. He’ll be back if survival on day 1

 

[Loochblade]

Have you played with him before? Is this sort of behaviour normal?

I have not. It's a feeling, because most of Juice's posts these last couple of hours read like just passive aggressive unloading of frustration.