WWE/WHC Notes

[MikeRaw]

- Here's a few interesting facts...

Every World Heavyweight Title match on WWE pay-per-view since 2006 has featured either The Undertaker, Edge or Batista. Even more, all three of those Superstars have been out during that same period of time for long stretches of time with torn muscles.

Furthermore, since the WWE Title was created, every Title match but two has had either Triple H, John Cena or Randy Orton in it. In both of those other two shows, Triple H was in the actual main event as his match was pushed harder than the Title match.

------------

Now, the first part is true, so thats fine, but the second part.... Who in the hell was stupid enough to write that?
They are saying every wwe title match in history, since its been created, has had either Cena, HHH or Orton? Well, seeing as it was created in like the 60's, thats clearly not true...
Anyways, I think they mean since the spinner version was created, they should have clarified though no: Thats pretty shitty that in 3 years, every match has had at least one of them in it...

 

[Kaedon]

This is old news methinks

 

[Vandy316]

shows how great the writers minds have been in the past three years.

 

[MikeRaw]

^Ya probably. IDK, I saw it posted under June 20th 08, but it could really be from anytime.

 

[Conc3pt]

If they mean in the last 3 years or so for the WWE championship, which two are they talking about? The only match I could think of that didn't involve any of those three was Edge vs RVD at Vengeance 2006..what else was there?

 

[Vandy316]

who all was in the 5 way match cause i dont remember any of those six in it. Mick Foley, Booker T, and who else

 

[Tsaalyo Phoenix]

^ Foley, Booker, Orton, Cena, and Lashley.

 

[chessarmy]

I can't believe the World Heavyweight Title stat, since 2006 either Edge, Taker, or Tista have been in the main event on a PPV wrestling for that belt. The WWE Title one is quite shocking too. I think I might know why ratings are going down, because the fucking product is so repetitive! On RAW we are seeing Triple H vs John Cena AGAIN, and on Smackdown! we are going to see Taker vs Edge again when he returns!

 

[Tsaalyo Phoenix]

^ Plus, when a superstar is injured, everything is put on hold until he gets back. Like when Candice broke her clavicle, Beth just killed jobbers until she got back. Then she was injured again, and MORE jobber killing. It's like they can't think of more than one thing.

 

[MikeRaw]

^Candice*

And for the record, thats a pretty misleading stat. In 3 years, the PPV main events have had one of those 3, yes, but that doesnt make it the same event. It doesnt mean it was always HHH/Cena or Cena/Orton. It means one of the three were in there, so you can still have stuff like
Cena/Khali
Cena/Edge
Cena/Y2J
Cena/Christian
Cena/HBK
Cena/etc
Those are some of the other maatches we've seen since 05, so its not as repetitive as this stat makes it sound, theres still some other matchups that have happened.

 

[Tsaalyo Phoenix]

^ My bad. I guess the Divas all sort of blend together when they all have the same gimmick. :shifty:

 

[MikeRaw]

^Werent you the one who said gimmicks shouldnt matter, and it should just be good matches... But now you want gimmicks? Oh, my bad, I shoulde remembered your a hyprocrite sheep

Another perfect Example:

Raw gets a 3.0, you say its low, and people shouldnt make excuses because if it was a compelling product, people would forget other stuff and tune in... Then iMpact gets a 0.8, and you say "Well, the NBA final was on, thats why it was low"
:laugh: I thought if it was compelling, people would tune in no matter what... ?

 

[HHHforever]

This is old news methinks

I agree, I read this quite a while ago. The WHC situation has been a lot worse than the WWE title one because the WHC has pretty much been a revolving door of those three fighting each other with a couple exceptions. The WWE title has had a lot of different feuds, Cena just held the belt for 14+ months or whatever it was.

^Werent you the one who said gimmicks shouldnt matter, and it should just be good matches... But now you want gimmicks? Oh, my bad, I shoulde remembered your a hyprocrite sheep

Another perfect Example:

Raw gets a 3.0, you say its low, and people shouldnt make excuses because if it was a compelling product, people would forget other stuff and tune in... Then iMpact gets a 0.8, and you say "Well, the NBA final was on, thats why it was low"
:laugh: I thought if it was compelling, people would tune in no matter what... ?

Don't expect an answer to that question. Traditionally when good points are brought up and Roxxi can't respond she disappears from said thread for about 3 days until the thread sinks to the bottom. Whence why she never responded when I said the same exact thing in the ratings thread. Instead of just admitting she's wrong, she goes into hiding.

 

[chessarmy]

^ Roxxi is a guy...

And I've never seen him "run away" from a thread. Its unreal that everyone is hating on him just because he has a different opinion

 

[MikeRaw]

LOL, ya, Roxxi is a guy... But Chessarmy, if you dont believe it, how come when people said the exact same thing in the ratings thread, Roxxi didnt answer and back up his opinion then when he was wrong? And how come he hasnt answered here even though he viewed the thread after I posted...?