Here is the thing, I'll admit I'm not a fan of both Hardy's, I was at one time. But now they are just parodies of what they used to be. But thats not why I would say Jeff shouldn't be champion, it's because he is unreliable. Putting the belt on him even though he was awaiting drug charges was foolish and downright stupid for TNA.
He could still be used in major angles, but he should never be the champion, contrary to what Vince Russo says about titles, they do mean something, they mean this is the guy representing your company. The face of the company should not have a blackeye.
He can be used as HBK was used for WWE, he didn't need the belt to sell tickets, much like Jeff Hardy has a built in fanbase that will pay to see him. He doesn't need an ugly purple belt.
thoughts?
He could still be used in major angles, but he should never be the champion, contrary to what Vince Russo says about titles, they do mean something, they mean this is the guy representing your company. The face of the company should not have a blackeye.
He can be used as HBK was used for WWE, he didn't need the belt to sell tickets, much like Jeff Hardy has a built in fanbase that will pay to see him. He doesn't need an ugly purple belt.
thoughts?