-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
Unpopular Opinions v2
- Thread starter Roadster
- Start date
3:
I did too, and I feel like it's only liked as a medium of nostalgia, nowadays.
Finally thought I was the only one
In some ways. That’s a pretty broad time period. TNA had a great X division and main event scene from 05-09. The rest of the show sucked and was really amateurish in their presentation and how they portrayed itself. I think the Impact Wrestling era from 2011-mid 2014 was probably the tightest and most well-rounded Impact was.
Promos, character > the actual match
In what context?
For me 2006 TNA was the best
The shows were entertaining regardless if it was bad. TNA was sports entertainment. Most of us fell in love with Sports Entertainment and we enjoy the professional wrestling aspect along with it.
TNA gave both of those things while AEW only supplies the wrestling part. It’s not that entertaining to watch. Anyone who enjoyed WCW, WWF and WWE are fans of the entertainment aspect. AEW lacks there highly IMHO. If anything, they come off very amateurish compared to TNA.
Any episode of TNA around that time from a structural standpoint was great.
Just literally compare the structure of a TNA episode around the time period I said to yesterday's Dynamite's episode.
Just literally compare the structure of a TNA episode around the time period I said to yesterday's Dynamite's episode.
there is no context.
It’s just what he said lmao.
If you take away the story and character, the match is just good. You add them and it’s amazing.
Take Cena vs Punk 2011. You take away the characters and story it’s like an okay/good match. The story and characters made it amazing.