TNA's booking does NOT suck, and I can prove it!

[berrysi]

Having just read through the evidence provided by thread starter, I'm still of the opinion that in general TNA's booking is and has been poor for some time now. Wrestling is subjective, therefore different peeps are equally allowed to view things how they see it, I don't personally find the booking to be of a good nature in TNA, but some others do, simple. Why do peeps consistently feel the need to try and prove or disprove something that is at the end of the day subjective. How peeps view booking quality isn't of a quantifiable nature, live and let live, enjoy something for yourself and why give two cents if a possible majority or group don't agree with your view.

 

[dstebbins]

why give two cents if a possible majority or group don't agree with your view.

Because that's what Homo Sapiens do! ANIMALS don't give a shit what's happening around them. Humans strive to be challenged. That's why we have internet forums, to talk, debate, and provide evidence.

 

[berrysi]

That's why we have internet forums, to talk, debate, and provide evidence.

Next time think before posting then because if you believe ratings are a value that represents the quality of booking, then I think your very deluded.

 

[Montana]

I can sum it up in one word: Ratings.

That's right, folks. In the past year, TNA Impact has experienced a near doubling in average Neilson ratings. :

DO you have any idea what you are talking about. You want facts, heres facts.



TNA Impact Ratings

2005

Date Rating
October 4, 2005 0.8
October 11, 2005 0.8
October 18, 2005 0.8
October 25, 2005 0.9
November 3, 2005 0.9
November 12, 2005 0.8
November 19, 2005 0.6
November 26, 2005 0.8
December 4, 2005 0.8
December 8, 2005 0.8
December 17, 2005 0.7
December 24, 2005 0.9
December 31, 2005 0.8

2006

Date Rating
January 7, 2006 0.9
January 14, 2006 0.8
January 21, 2006 0.9
January 28, 2006 1.1
February 4, 2006 0.7
February 11, 2006 0.8
February 18, 2006 0.7
February 25, 2006 0.9
March 4, 2006 0.7
March 11, 2006 0.7
March 18, 2006 0.9
March 25, 2006 0.9
April 1, 2006 0.6
April 8, 2006 1.0
April 13, 2006 1.1
April 20, 2006 0.9
April 27, 2006 0.8
May 4, 2006 0.9
May 11, 2006 1.0
May 18, 2006 1.1
May 25, 2006 1.2
June 1, 2006 1.1
June 8, 2006 1.0
June 15, 2006 0.8
June 22, 2006 1.1
June 29, 2006 1.1
July 6, 2006 1.0
July 13, 2006 0.9
July 20, 2006 0.8
July 27, 2006 0.8
August 2, 2006 0.8
August 9, 2006 ?.?
August 16, 2006 ?.?
August 23, 2006 0.8
August 30, 2006 0.8
September 7, 2006 0.7
September 14, 2006 0.7
September 21, 2006 ?.?
September 28, 2006 0.88
October 5, 2006 0.8
October 12, 2006 0.9
October 19, 2006 0.8
October 26, 2006 0.8
November 2, 2006 0.8
November 9, 2006 ?.?
November 16, 2006 1.0
November 23, 2006 0.9
November 30, 2006 1.0
December 7, 2006 1.0
December 14, 2006 1.2
December 21, 2006 1.1
December 28, 2006 0.9

2007

Date Rating
January 4, 2007 1.1
January 11, 2007 1.1
January 18, 2007 1.1
January 24, 2007 0.8
January 31, 2007 1.0
February 8, 2007 1.1
February 15, 2007 0.6
February 22, 2007 1.0
March 1, 2007 1.1
March 8, 2007 1.0
March 15, 2007 1.1
March 22, 2007 1.0
March 29, 2007 1.0
April 5, 2007 0.9
April 12, 2007 1.1
April 19, 2007 1.1
April 26, 2007 1.0
May 3, 2007 1.0
May 10, 2007 1.0
May 17, 2007 1.0
May 24, 2007 1.0

Other TNA Ratings

Date Rating
This is TNA Special (February 12, 2007) 1.2

In nearly two years, they went from .08 to 1.2, with better time slots, and signing big name talents. They arent getting enough results from sting, Cage, Angle. Basically if you look at the ratings when Cage, and Angle came in the ratings jumped, and now they faded back.

So really there is nothing to argue about...here it is. Everyone is talkin fact this, and fact that.

 

[berrysi]

But 0.8 to 1.2 is clearly nearly a doubling in ratings. :sarcasticlookwithoddlaughface:

 

[Rell]

Like I said Ratings equal widespread popularity, not quality. IMO the booking may be improving, but I still disagree with a lot of decisions they make. I will say this, The tag team division looks promising...