How many of you are actually excited for Brock/Big Show?
- Thread starter Crayo
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 47,754
- Reaction score
- 14,050
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 34
Who else would you guys have Brock squash at the RR?
Brock could be wrestling Barney the dinosaur and I would be hyped.
Brock could be wrestling Barney the dinosaur and I would be hyped.
It's just that he doesn't need to be there.
He's winning the title in the Chamber match, so should have been built as the mystery 6th entrant or Heyman got him a spot on the go-home show. There are some huge storylines ongoing (Punk/HHH, Orton/Cena, Bryan/Wyatts, Shield tension, start of WM season, Batista's return), so not like Lesnar is essential to the product. I guess we won't see him for long parts of 2014.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 47,754
- Reaction score
- 14,050
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 34
I'll Enjoy Brcok destroying Show's shoulder. I like Brock I just really think they could've worked it in better. Oh well, the show goes on right? or in this case hopefully The Show doesn't go on.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 47,754
- Reaction score
- 14,050
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 34
clearly not this terrible booking decision will grind WWE to a halt! how could they waste Bork's dates on big show?!!??!?!?
Haha 
He's signed through WM 31 so that's good.. However if UFC comes along and offers him a MORE lucrative contract than I believe he will walk away because Vince did not put a protection clause in his contract.
He's signed through WM 31 so that's good.. However if UFC comes along and offers him a MORE lucrative contract than I believe he will walk away because Vince did not put a protection clause in his contract.
You're completely missing the point. Brock v Show happening three months ago, when literally the only storylines were Bryan/Authority and Punk/Heyman, would have been a lot better amirite?
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 47,754
- Reaction score
- 14,050
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 34
No, because nobody cares about WWE 3 month ago. they bring in Brock for the big shows, not fucking hell in a cell or other throwaway bullshit.
Brock doesn't want to get his ass kicked anymore for real.Haha
He's signed through WM 31 so that's good.. However if UFC comes along and offers him a MORE lucrative contract than I believe he will walk away because Vince did not put a protection clause in his contract.
I'm okay with it happening. Great way to try to reestablish Lesnar from all the idiotic booking decisions they've made with him. They've already started that process, but the good thing with Big Show is that going over him always means something.
Doesn't mean I give anything resembling a shit about the match or that the feud doesn't bore me.ity:
But really, isn't this what the Rumble is used for? You can dick around and add a bunch of matches and don't have to worry about them drawing since the Rumble sells itself.
Doesn't mean I give anything resembling a shit about the match or that the feud doesn't bore me.
ity: But really, isn't this what the Rumble is used for? You can dick around and add a bunch of matches and don't have to worry about them drawing since the Rumble sells itself.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2012
- Messages
- 6,691
- Reaction score
- 1,927
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 37
- Location
- Union City, Tennessee
Some thought Brock/Henry would have been better but I disagree. Show is a better choice imo since his larger size gives him more credibility (not to mention Lesnar more credibility when he defeats him), especially when it comes to tossing Brock around the ring like a rag doll. Plus, Lesnar kicking out of the WMD (maybe even two of them in a roll) would look cooler than kicking out of the world's strongest slam. I think all and all that Big Show makes for the better match than Henry.
I still think Langston would have been a good alternate choice for all the reasons I mentioned earlier. If they're gonna have Brock come in and go over someone, why not do it with someone who could still look like a bad ass by going toe to toe with Lesnar and get a rub as a result, even in defeat.
I still think Langston would have been a good alternate choice for all the reasons I mentioned earlier. If they're gonna have Brock come in and go over someone, why not do it with someone who could still look like a bad ass by going toe to toe with Lesnar and get a rub as a result, even in defeat.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 47,754
- Reaction score
- 14,050
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 34
What idiotic booking decisions? Nobody has been booked as strongly as Lesnar since his re-debut. He is 3-2 and both of the losses (to 2/3 of the big 3 in the company along with Taker)and he absolutely dominated both matches he lost. I just can't wrap my mind around anyone thinking Lesnar hasn't been booked like God.
I'm okay with it happening. Great way to try to reestablish Lesnar from all the idiotic booking decisions they've made with him. They've already started that process, but the good thing with Big Show is that going over him always means something.
Doesn't mean I give anything resembling a shit about the match or that the feud doesn't bore me.
But really, isn't this what the Rumble is used for? You can dick around and add a bunch of matches and don't have to worry about them drawing since the Rumble sells itself.
Same here. Both matches he lost were because of foreign objects or other scumfuckery. Which basically said Cena and Trips weren't strong/powerful enough to take out Brock by normal means.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 47,754
- Reaction score
- 14,050
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 34
I haven't seen last night's stuff yet, but the segment where Show came down and tossed Lesnar on his head clear across the ring was fucking awesome.