so you think he legit thought he could away with wagoning Brad?
Do you mean Tweet? Tweet admitted he thought he could get away with it without copping much suspicion.
saying im not doing much is RUDE
ya ...wait what can we say here again?
ya ...... THERE'S SIX DOTS. figure it out.
odo shooting the bg is ehhhh.
he doesn't care about roles so that wouldn't really stop him, but killing the bg day 1 is annoying nonetheless especially when you can sort of direct his shots. zoning in on a read like that lines up with what he does though.
also, from a setup point, he had to announce the kill in the thread. usually scum dont have to announce their day kills in the thread. probably fine with town for now.
i think i missed something because i havent seen cp post, but now i realized cp's name isnt cp so who the fuck is cp?
the red prince?
wait why do you town read me?
Day kept going as well so it was definitely a day kill not an execute or anything which works in his favour.
@Doddsy who do you think was scum that was pressuring haza in his first life? same question to
I can't fully remember everyone that put their vote down. I don't like how Chimp voted, as I mentioned earlier. He followed your wagon by saying "I trust Magic" which was weird anyway considering you'd done nothing to be trusted for. Then he swapped over to haza without explanation or giving thoughts on anything else. Didn't like Tweets vote much either as it seemed more like him just trying to move away from himself, he swapped to Chimp as well in a similar fashion when CP voted. I can see that being just self preservation but seems more like he's just going wherever he can rather than anyone he's actually pushing or reading himself to me.
I'm still not liking CP
Literally two minutes
That was a pretty obvious joke tbh
I never got a chance to finish the whole thread but Doddsy is the only one who has stuck out as suspicous to me from what i've read. im not really buying his suspicion on tweet.
in this post he implies he doesn't believe tweet intentionally voted brad and is reading him scum for it, but later
he says he's not saying tweet voted because he legit bought into the wagon and is now citing different reasoning. this seems a bit contradictory to me? if he didn't buy into the wagon then how can he unintentionally 'bite that bait'? doesn't really make sense, it seems like he found more solid reasoning after further questoning and is now using that instead (which it is more solid).
also if tweet is scum and knows the wagon is 'bait' wouldn't it make more sense for him not to get on knowing he risks suspicion as opposed to if he's town where he wouldn't care as much?
That's not true, I didn't imply I didn't believe Tweet intentionally voted Brad because I don't really understand what you mean by that. I didn't believe the reasoning Tweet gave, that he thought he could easily get away with it, which is the same thing I'm talking about it the second point?
It’s just not a very good case (by Doddsy). I see poor cases as both alignments - once people have decided they want to lynch another player, they’ll throw whatever they can find at them.
It's not a case to begin with, I was just asking him questions and pressuring him.
.gif "Lauren :lauren")
