I never got a chance to finish the whole thread but Doddsy is the only one who has stuck out as suspicous to me from what i've read. im not really buying his suspicion on tweet.
he says he's not saying tweet voted because he legit bought into the wagon and is now citing different reasoning. this seems a bit contradictory to me? if he didn't buy into the wagon then how can he unintentionally 'bite that bait'? doesn't really make sense, it seems like he found more solid reasoning after further questoning and is now using that instead (which it is more solid).
also if tweet is scum and knows the wagon is 'bait' wouldn't it make more sense for him not to get on knowing he risks suspicion as opposed to if he's town where he wouldn't care as much?
in this post he implies he doesn't believe tweet intentionally voted brad and is reading him scum for it, but later
I don't much like this is as reasoning, as you're trying to tell me you intentionally bit on the bait, without any sort of consideration to whether or not Magic would just jump at you right away, or that you'd be sussed for it?
I'm not insinuating your vote was because you thought he had a point, it's more so the similarities between your vote and Chimps vote are there, and you think his vote was bad and worthy of suspicion but you never thought you would cop any suspicion for yours.
Also I didn't know CP voted with that as well
Elaborate please
he says he's not saying tweet voted because he legit bought into the wagon and is now citing different reasoning. this seems a bit contradictory to me? if he didn't buy into the wagon then how can he unintentionally 'bite that bait'? doesn't really make sense, it seems like he found more solid reasoning after further questoning and is now using that instead (which it is more solid).
also if tweet is scum and knows the wagon is 'bait' wouldn't it make more sense for him not to get on knowing he risks suspicion as opposed to if he's town where he wouldn't care as much?
.gif "Lauren :lauren")