SpaceR said:
Idiot, it's because of the content. Not because they can't say fuck or shit
and your proof is? Why did the content suddenly magically detoriate with the introduction of pg?
__________
seabs said:
Ratings is how many people watch a show on TV. It's a crude definition but a viable one. Which product will draw the higher rating? A poor one with strong marketing or a good one which no one has heard of? How can someone watch a show they haven't heard of?
Yes rating means how many people watch the show on TV. Finally u got it right.
Now heres the debate.
Lets say two shows are advertised the same, generally the better among these two shows will be watched by more people at tv hence increasing its ratings. Hence rating = quality of the show.
Now off to your marketing point.
Are you trying to say that wwe hasnt been marketed right since the pg era?
As a matter of fact WWE is marketed MORE nowadays than in the WWF days or the AE Era days. Most of the wrestlers do movies, participate in tv shows, guest appearences at functions, parties, host tv shows etc etc. WWE also take part in more brands and sponsor many things. Hence even the most notorius skeptic wouldnt argue that WWE now is marketed atleast 5x better than in the WWF days. in the AE WWE was more of a cult following, it has drastically changed to a icon, a brand nowadays.
And with more marketing wwe is still getting lower ratings.
That just proves my point that the quality of the show has declined to a new low.