I'm going to say TNA because even if they're releasing some of their great talents they still make it a bit more interesting.
Del Rio young and fresh? You must be kidding. I thought you talked about Cena with that exception. Also, Curtis Axel isn't a new guy in the company, they only changed his name.TNA's champs, Old guys.
WWE Champions, Young fresh guys with one exception/
TNA's champs, Old guys.
WWE Champions, Young fresh guys with one exception/
Del Rio young and fresh? You must be kidding. I thought you talked about Cena with that exception. Also, Curtis Axel isn't a new guy in the company, they only changed his name.
And your point is what?. WWE have had "young, fresh" guys as Champions before and they went absolutely fucking nowhere (Jack fucking Swagger lol)
But my point is WWE are using the talent much much better right now. All I see in TNA is old guys, Sting, Angle, Bubba etc in the Main Event scene, Yes the WWE title has that right now but thats why there is 2 World titles is the WHC is for younger guys and then they move on to the WWE title.
Uh so what? I thought the question was who uses talent better? Not who has better talent? Ziggler alone is more talented than 90% of either roster, yet they've used him like complete fucking shit (up until only recently). Same thing can be said for Daniel Bryan. That's not good use of talent, imo. lolThe US Champ in WWE has more talent in every aspect than all TNA's champs with the exception of James Storm.
TNA for two main reasons: Aries and Roode. I don't think they'd be utilized by WWE as well as they have been in TNA.
You can say they are. Axel is nice. Ambrose is a really talented guy, but he wouldn't be able to win the X-Division titleWho said he had to be new? Axel is young and talented. Del Rio was the exception. The US Champ in WWE has more talent in every aspect than all TNA's champs with the exception of James Storm.
You can say they are. Axel is nice. Ambrose is a really talented guy, but he wouldn't be able to win the X-Division title