This is the most laughably absurd thing I've ever read. Don't listen to everyone else, but listen to me because I am objectively right.A subjective poll from a forum that has less than 5,000 members doesn’t disprove objective audio levels nor does it cure your hearing deficiency.
I can make a poll on this website asking members who had more ratings victories head to head in 1999, Rock or Austin.
And I’d guarantee you Austin would win, yet objectively Rock had more:
Since you’re not well skilled in debate and rather novice, let me point out what your fallacy here is:
Your claims have therefore been rendered null and void... and therefore refuted.
You're also one of the worst debaters I've ever seen. Denying straight facts when presented to you and when someone with credibility refutes your argument, you just say they're a lair like that somehow makes you right and your argument better so you shouldn't be talking about anyone's debate skills.
The point of the poll is to show you how arbitrary and subjective this topic was, but you don't understand the difference so it goes right over your head.
And if we take your thread at face value, you tried to claim one pop was loudest based on how you heard it, so asking others to lsiten to pops and vote on what's the loudest isn't a simple appeal to popularity. It's asking them to judge things they hear for themselves and making a judgment.
It's the same thing as the ratings argument because most people voting wouldn't be voting with the knowledge needed for something that has concrete facts to support an argument of that nature where as someone voting in this poll only needs to listen to the actual pops provided in this thread.
Last edited:
I didn’t insult you... 
