Everything you say doesn’t automatically become a fact bro. If you can outsmart your opponent, I see no reason why then winning isn’t realistic.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
Revisionist History surrounding Chris Kreski
- Thread starter RLStern
- Start date
Everything you say doesn’t automatically become a fact bro. If you can outsmart your opponent, I see no reason why then winning isn’t realistic.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It doesn’t matter if you’re smarter, if you’re smaller and significantly weaker, you’re not conjure enough strength to get a roll up on them, nor will your offense hurt them.
Real life will tell you other wise. Seen plenty of times where a big bully was knocked out by a smaller person. But let me guess, that doesn’t matter and you have some excuse for it like you do everything because everything you say is 100% fact because you’re the smartest man alive.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don’t enjoy today’s matches because I don’t cate for the product right now, but take me back to 2011-2014.
Then I could enjoy a modern match with good angles.
Then I could enjoy a modern match with good angles.
Nah the ratings sucked also so clearly it wasn’t good.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There is no excuse, in real life many big unskilled guys who can’t fight get beat.
This is pro wrestling though, the big guys on top of the card should never ever get beat by smaller guys.
A kurgan or a Mason Ryan, but not someone like Lesnar or Goldberg.
Lesnar should be beating guys like Ricochet in less than a minute.
Better than today’s, though.
True, while 2002-2015 was garbage compared to 1997-2002 and 1984-1994, it’s still way better than today.
That’s how you know we’re watching the worst product ever, when it makes that era look better.
I don’t agree with your entire premise, but Lesnar should be squashing Ricochet in a minute. Right @Shania Twain
When the 2010s stared I had no idea how that was gonna be the last kinda good stretch and end in 2015.
I yearned for the attitude era back then and now I’d happily go back to the reality era or whatever it’s called.
Better than today’s, though.
I mean yeah. I’m just trying to make fun of people who judge how good something is off the ratings it gets. Where I seen shows they get high ratings that I hate because they just aren’t good in my opinion. If someone just says it’s not good because they don’t enjoy it, cool. I’ll agree, the WWE is horrible to watch right now. But when I get matches I enjoy it makes sitting through shit worth it sometimes. I enjoy AEW overall, but they sometimes give me episodes I don’t really like but I enjoy a match or two every week. Same with Impact.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I thought there was improvement when Rock came back and Gewirtz stepped down as head of creative. Then we got the Shield, Daniel Bryan, Authority and Rock come back.
We still had storyline and character and actual selling. Now wrestlers today piss on that era.
Brock beating Ricochet sure. But I got zero problem with someone smaller beating someone bigger when it’s booked right. Like I said feel free to have your opinion man, if that’s what you like it’s what you like. I like what I like, you like what you like, and we both can be happy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And yet people claim AEW Dynamite is the best weekly wrestling show. Usually consists of 5 matches running from 15-20 minutes. Sometimes theyre barely able to squeeze in promos and segments. Surprised how overrated it is.
Last edited:
