Like, I don't even get how this can be even up for debate.
1.) Banez claims VT
2.) Rugrat claims Banez is right via investigation
3.) Lethal shoots Banez
4.) Banez lives
5a.) If Lethal is lying, why the fuck would he set up BANEZ of all people just for a one-off that would immediately backfire just by virtue of Banez's flip?
5b.) If Lethal is honest, then Banez is lying, and if we go off Rugrat's investigation, then Banez must be Godfather or II.
5c.) Rugrat is lying to get brownie points.
5d.) Somebody blocked Lethal or protected Banez, in which case, WHY!? Not for nothing, but Lethal isn't the most dangerous of players, and Banez ain't shit. So why?