WWE's new business goal

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Rysenberg

Legend
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
10,893
Reaction score
1,241
Points
0
Location
United Scotland of Ambrose
Crayo said:
This. So how is it backwards? PPV buys are never going to increase consistently in modern society.

It's common sense. It's completely logical for TNA to be doing the same thing so the hate on this is Blue.

Also, it means a better weekly product... isn't that what you people want? You just want one random PPV a month being 5/10 and consistent 1/10 shows?

Leo C said:
True, the benefit of them focusing on weekly shows is that we'll have a good show every week, instead of a good show every month.

Crayo said:
Also, to add more, a good show every week = more PPV buys.

My thoughts exactly. And I think as long as they give wrestlers like Bryan, Punk, Ziggler etc time we will still get quality PPVs.
 

Snowman1

Chillin' with the snowmies.
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
33,052
Reaction score
11,726
Points
0
Location
Cuteville
The best the show was recently was during the Summer of Punk.
The best the build for a PPV was recently was Money in the Bank.

So why can't you do both?
 

Donald Trump_

WWEF Forums Sickest Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
255
Points
0
Location
LA, Cali
Rainman said:
The best the show was recently was during the Summer of Punk.
The best the build for a PPV was recently was Money in the Bank.

So why can't you do both?

With the improved weekly shows the build should naturally become better. The weekly shows will contain better story-lines and what not.
 

Saylor

Champion
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
4,760
Reaction score
193
Points
63
Age
29
Website
www.wweforums.net
I like the fact that they're going to be focusing on improving their TV products, which is great news. I'd rather be watching a great show and a semi-decent paper view than watching boring TV products and a decent paper-view.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Rainman said:
The best the show was recently was during the Summer of Punk.
The best the build for a PPV was recently was Money in the Bank.

So why can't you do both?

True. This doesn't mean PPVs will go down. Better weekly shows, better builds for PPV matches. And it's not that hard booking PPVs: it's supposed to be the blow off of recent storylines, the change only means that big plot points will probably happen on TV instead of happening on PPV. The matches will be as good as they are today.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
34
DT-bomb123 said:
They need better talent
enough said

:facepalm1:

No, they need to push the talent they have instead of focusing shows on 4 people, one of them being the GM and one of them being a 40 year old 450 lb oaf
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snowman1

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
WWE has an amazing pool of talent as D'Z said, they just don't know how to use it.