WWE TV-14

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
We'd get to see Rusev get a ton of heat for putting Lana down with a kick
Except, knowing WWE's audience, who likes cheering the heel, it could just as well backfire and make them pop because "edgy".

A factor in why there is not violence towards women in WWE is not just because it is wrong. But because WWE have conditioned their fanbase to react positively to it through their own doing. Which would send the wrong message.
 

The GOAT

The Architect
Hotshot
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
Messages
3,334
Reaction score
1,703
Points
0
Age
36
Yeah I was thinking more along the lines of the more racy stuff (i.e. bra and panties), but I see your point.

And I dunno. It's just a pipe dream of mine really. I mean how much does the "live" aspect bring people in or really count anymore? There's a delay usually so they can bleep things if need be or whatever. So record the show in it's entirety before hand, showing a TV-14 version on the network (presumably the longer version) hours before or even at the same time it airs on USA.

I'm no business man though. Just a fan.

I've always questioned myself just how much the results being available really contributed to less viewers. It's always seemed more of an over-exaggeration to me than anything, since when the WWF's ratings improved in 1998, Raw was still a taped show (it didn't become live every week until mid-99), and when their ratings eventually plateaued and went down a couple million following the end of the AE, they were a live one.

The biggest issue here though wouldn't be the Live vs Taped aspect, but rather the fact that people would have no reason to watch Raw on USA Network if it was aired on the Network. They keep a catalog of all their episodes of Raw and Smackdown on the Network, and thus if people wanted to re-watch anything, they could do so on there.

Except, knowing WWE's audience, who likes cheering the heel, it could just as well backfire and make them pop because "edgy".

A factor in why there is not violence towards women in WWE is not just because it is wrong. But because WWE have conditioned their fanbase to react positively to it through their own doing. Which would send the wrong message.

They typically only cheer if either someone they love is assaulting a woman (because that person is perceived to be so cool that they can do almost no wrong), or if a female that happens to be a heel is getting their comeuppance in some way. It's hard for me to remember hardly any time that someone got a positive reaction for assaulting a woman that the audience cared about. Sable was so well liked that Mero got some quality heat for mistreating her without even needing to put his hands on her. Lana was the same when Rusev ordered her to go to the back during a few of his matches.
 

Trip in the Head

Jester of Darkness
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
14,361
Reaction score
4,279
Points
0
Age
42
Location
Maine
The biggest issue here though wouldn't be the Live vs Taped aspect, but rather the fact that people would have no reason to watch Raw on USA Network if it was aired on the Network. They keep a catalog of all their episodes of Raw and Smackdown on the Network, and thus if people wanted to re-watch anything, they could do so on there.

Unless, of course, they didn't have the network. And if they don't want their kids to see the TV-14 stuff they wouldn't have to get it. I'm sure the kids would still want to watch. My kids LOVE Cena and they hardly ever watch wrestling. It's like magic I swear.

And that catalog is so behind though. One of my big issues with the network is that the newest RAW and SD episodes aren't immediately available there after they air. I can watch them on Hulu the next day - so why not the network. It probably has to do with contracts and agreements and stuff but that doesn't mean I have to like it.
 

Majour

Filthy Creep
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
3,221
Reaction score
1,806
Points
0
Location
Smallman Section
And that catalog is so behind though. One of my big issues with the network is that the newest RAW and SD episodes aren't immediately available there after they air. I can watch them on Hulu the next day - so why not the network. It probably has to do with contracts and agreements and stuff but that doesn't mean I have to like it.

From my limited knowledge on this kind of shit, they're tied into contracts where the TV networks have exclusivity and what not. The TV networks basically get to have the rights for like thirty days (I think Sky Sports have that deal) or whatever time limit they agreed upon (minus Hulu, but I don't think we even get that over here). It's only really now that on demand services (The Network, Netflix etc.) are massive business. I think when a lot of the contracts were done, on demand services weren't such a big thing and weren't factored into things.