Why would it matter? Even if Charlotte loses it, we now know she'll definitely win it back in two weeks.You guys act like it's not going to be a 3 way at Mania between 3/4 of the horsewomen
Belt don't mean shit if you're headlining shows without it.
Stop being a mark.
Having the belt means you're the best, and don't do that when you're saying Charlotte having it's what's best. You seem to think it matters when Charlotte has it.Belt don't mean shit if you're headlining shows without it.
Stop being a mark.
Then I guess you'll be okay with Roman losing his belt...or Miz losing his next time he defends it?? Or hype bros winning the belts...In a FAKE sport, belts are just props.
Having the belt means you're the best, and don't do that when you're saying Charlotte having it's what's best. You seem to think it matters when Charlotte has it.
Because theres more money in faces chasing a heel champion, its better narratively.Having the belt means you're the best, and don't do that when you're saying Charlotte having it's what's best. You seem to think it matters when Charlotte has it.
In a FAKE sport, belts are just props.
He just lost to Goldberg in 30 seconds. Also, he had a very lengthy run with the belt.Brock Lesnar is still the best and he doesn't need no fuckin' belt.
Then I guess you'll be okay with Roman losing his belt...or Miz losing his next time he defends it?? Or hype bros winning the belts...
Because theres more money in faces chasing a heel champion, its better narratively.
That's fine, but we've done that 4 times and she's had it for like 400 some odd days.Because theres more money in faces chasing a heel champion, its better narratively.
So Roman is face, so he shouldn't win the belt?Because theres more money in faces chasing a heel champion, its better narratively.