- Joined
- Dec 5, 2011
- Messages
- 10,876
- Reaction score
- 86
- Points
- 48
- Location
- Australia
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
I think it's only cause it's Kane lol. Which I understand you being a fan you want your fav to be champ like I do but in reality it won't fix a thing which is why it's not even worth doing. Sure you'll get the quick rating spike due to a title change for a week but that's all.True WWE can always book something else above the WWE title but I still think that after a few quiet months that there are more pros than cons for a quick back and forth title change. Maybe I am a bit too into the idea because I am a Kane mark but I still think that it wouldn't be a bad idea.
Very positive it's 30 days. I'm sure it's also 30 days to defend all titles as well.
Yeah I think you're right the 30 day thing is for defenses not for the rematch.I thought a rematch clause was good for 90 days and the title has to be defended every 30
I'll never forget the return of HHH in 2002. The most hated heel in the business got the biggest pop of the millennium in MSG. They gave him pure respect because they realized what they had been missing. HHH was so good befor ethe first quad injury it was insane how much he made you hate him and then made you love everything he was involved with in the ring