If Bret was a ratings cancer, explain to me why WWE didn't start losing the ratings war until Bret and two wrestlers he put over immensely (Hall and Nash) left after WM12. The internet hate for Bret Hart and his name being dragged in to every thread involving Shawn Michaels is ridiculous. It's truly a tell-tale sign of someone's cluelessness when they assume any critic on earth still has a side of the fence between those two because of Survivor Series 97 which is childish and idiotic in every sense of the words. I love both wrestlers immensely, but Michaels could have never done what Bret did because Michaels wasn't doing it when he was still relevant. Michaels hasn't been relevant since 1998 and the only people he put over were his friends, Vader to an extent, and Austin (against his will). A very welcomed addition since 2002 definitely, unquestionably the best Wrestlemania matches every year he participated at the event... but not relevant.
I'm not gonna argue that Michaels didn't draw, that I agree with you.
But Bret was a bona fide main eventer then too, and WWF champ for a lot of 1997. Bret didn't leave after WM 12......he left late '97, WWE started beating WCW again in early 1998 when Bret Hart was WCW World Champ for a period. Lets not play smoke and mirrors here, Bret was a top man in two failing companies so he has Michaels beat as far as killing ratings goes. I'll wait for someone to now point out "he was a huge international draw", which is another myth.
As for him not putting anyone over....fair enough in his first run, but he more than made up for that in his second. The only reason people talk about Shelton Benjamin is that match wiith Michaels, nothing else.