Moonlight Drive
Guest
Note: This is not a rant, unlike what the title may imply.
Okay, so we all know that the WWE is aiming their product at kids. At first I thought, waht tha hekkas? but for a different reason than you may think. I'm not angry about it or anything, I was just thinking about why the WWE would do that.
Now, let's think about it logically. What do most males, from probably 13 and upwards want to see on TV? What drives the stereotypical man? Sex and Violence. If you need even more proof, Raw's ratings peaked in the Attitude Era, where the core of the show was sex and violence.
So WHY would WWE tone down their shows and aim at younger kids, a minority compared to teenage-middle aged males who's parents might not even let them watch wrestling? MMA is extremely popular, and it's just straight up violence. No storys, no stupid gimmicks, just two guys beating the shit out of each other. And most guys love that.
It seems pretty anti-logical to me to take something which is violent and racy and turn it into some softcore telly tubby hour. If the WWE wants expansion and ratings, why aim kids when you could aim at adults? It makes no sense imo. You could argue they want to develop fans for the future, but c'mon, if they aim at kids, people will grow out of it very quickly.
So, what do you think? Do you think it defies logic to aim at a smaller demographic (kids) than aim at males 18-59 or whatever it is, a much larger group who is addicted to sex and violence?
Okay, so we all know that the WWE is aiming their product at kids. At first I thought, waht tha hekkas? but for a different reason than you may think. I'm not angry about it or anything, I was just thinking about why the WWE would do that.
Now, let's think about it logically. What do most males, from probably 13 and upwards want to see on TV? What drives the stereotypical man? Sex and Violence. If you need even more proof, Raw's ratings peaked in the Attitude Era, where the core of the show was sex and violence.
So WHY would WWE tone down their shows and aim at younger kids, a minority compared to teenage-middle aged males who's parents might not even let them watch wrestling? MMA is extremely popular, and it's just straight up violence. No storys, no stupid gimmicks, just two guys beating the shit out of each other. And most guys love that.
It seems pretty anti-logical to me to take something which is violent and racy and turn it into some softcore telly tubby hour. If the WWE wants expansion and ratings, why aim kids when you could aim at adults? It makes no sense imo. You could argue they want to develop fans for the future, but c'mon, if they aim at kids, people will grow out of it very quickly.
So, what do you think? Do you think it defies logic to aim at a smaller demographic (kids) than aim at males 18-59 or whatever it is, a much larger group who is addicted to sex and violence?