WS Draft Wars Series I NXT Takeover

[Kross Rhodes]

OMB said we’re making a takeover card. And voting on that. He needs to confirm this because I’m confused.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

I have no idea what wwe/nxt considers Canon fwiw hence why confusion at beginning of draft too.

 

[Daddy Dom]

Fwiw the list is more for a glossary does not need to be the end all be all. If you can prove they had a match on nxt then it is fine.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

OMB said we’re making a takeover card. And voting on that. He needs to confirm this because I’m confused.

Yeah dw I was kind of unsure too hence y i originally picked db 1st overall but then it seems while we are building cards were supposed to Judge the value of each pick by their nxt career so ya. Its open to.interpretation

 

[Kross Rhodes]

Cause if it’s a show card it shouldn’t matter how many matches he had. You just have to use the character and popularity they had when they were there.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Ultimately though it's omb show n it's not like I'm.unhappy w Joe lol

 

[Kross Rhodes]

Yeah dw I was kind of unsure too hence y i originally picked db 1st overall but then it seems while we are building cards were supposed to Judge the value of each pick by their nxt career so ya. Its open to.interpretation

I don’t think you can do both. Either we vote on a roster based on their careers or we vote on best match card.

 

[Daddy Dom]

OMB said we’re making a takeover card. And voting on that. He needs to confirm this because I’m confused.

I just said the takeover card as in ppv type based on their time in NXT so booty comment bout Daniel Bryan is somewhat right. I mean when you doing these drafts (no matter what draft your not basing it off of just a reg show your making your card as if was a mania or ppv right? Thats my thought on it.

 

[Daddy Dom]

So your trying to build the best card based off of their nxt run. I just used takeover as an example.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

I suppose taking punk in such a workrate heavy roster has a few risks too

 

[Kross Rhodes]

I just said the takeover card as in ppv type based on their time in NXT so booty comment bout Daniel Bryan is somewhat right. I mean when you doing these drafts (no matter what draft your not basing it off of just a reg show your making your card as if was a mania or ppv right? Thats my thought on it.

If it’s a card we’re making, then it shouldn’t matter right? If we take 2010 CM Punk and put him a match, it’s gonna be a good match right? Based on 2010 Punk?

Cuz I don’t see how him having 4 matches weakens his value on a match card. If we let just ranking out rosters based on their careers and not doing a match card, I misjudged and shouldn’t have taken him I guess.

I just don’t see how you can base it on both.

 

[Daddy Dom]

You can easily do both

 

[Canadian Dragon]

I think he just means u get that timelines version not necessarily their accomplishments if that makes sense. Loke u get wtv gimmick they were using so.ih ur gimmick is cm punk the nxt pro

 

[Kross Rhodes]

I don’t personally agree. 2010 Punk in a match is fire.

Don’t matter how many matches he had if this in best card with NXT superstars, lol.

I thoroughly disagree with premise, but what’s done.

 

[Bad News Booty]

If it’s a card we’re making, then it shouldn’t matter right? If we take 2010 CM Punk and put him a match, it’s gonna be a good match right? Based on 2010 Punk?

Cuz I don’t see how him having 4 matches weakens his value on a match card. If we let just ranking out rosters based on their careers and not doing a match card, I misjudged and shouldn’t have taken him I guess.

I just don’t see how you can base it on both.

I think it weakens it in the eyes of the voters


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro