WS Draft Wars Series I NXT Takeover

[Smart Marx]

OMB said we’re making a takeover card. And voting on that. He needs to confirm this because I’m confused.

 

[Comrade Khan]

I have no idea what wwe/nxt considers Canon fwiw hence why confusion at beginning of draft too.

 

[Kim Jong Umb]

Fwiw the list is more for a glossary does not need to be the end all be all. If you can prove they had a match on nxt then it is fine.

 

[Comrade Khan]

OMB said we’re making a takeover card. And voting on that. He needs to confirm this because I’m confused.

Yeah dw I was kind of unsure too hence y i originally picked db 1st overall but then it seems while we are building cards were supposed to Judge the value of each pick by their nxt career so ya. Its open to.interpretation

 

[Smart Marx]

Cause if it’s a show card it shouldn’t matter how many matches he had. You just have to use the character and popularity they had when they were there.

 

[Comrade Khan]

Ultimately though it's omb show n it's not like I'm.unhappy w Joe lol

 

[Smart Marx]

Yeah dw I was kind of unsure too hence y i originally picked db 1st overall but then it seems while we are building cards were supposed to Judge the value of each pick by their nxt career so ya. Its open to.interpretation

I don’t think you can do both. Either we vote on a roster based on their careers or we vote on best match card.

 

[Kim Jong Umb]

OMB said we’re making a takeover card. And voting on that. He needs to confirm this because I’m confused.

I just said the takeover card as in ppv type based on their time in NXT so booty comment bout Daniel Bryan is somewhat right. I mean when you doing these drafts (no matter what draft your not basing it off of just a reg show your making your card as if was a mania or ppv right? Thats my thought on it.

 

[Kim Jong Umb]

So your trying to build the best card based off of their nxt run. I just used takeover as an example.

 

[Comrade Khan]

I suppose taking punk in such a workrate heavy roster has a few risks too

 

[Smart Marx]

I just said the takeover card as in ppv type based on their time in NXT so booty comment bout Daniel Bryan is somewhat right. I mean when you doing these drafts (no matter what draft your not basing it off of just a reg show your making your card as if was a mania or ppv right? Thats my thought on it.

If it’s a card we’re making, then it shouldn’t matter right? If we take 2010 CM Punk and put him a match, it’s gonna be a good match right? Based on 2010 Punk?

Cuz I don’t see how him having 4 matches weakens his value on a match card. If we let just ranking out rosters based on their careers and not doing a match card, I misjudged and shouldn’t have taken him I guess.

I just don’t see how you can base it on both.

 

[Kim Jong Umb]

You can easily do both

 

[Comrade Khan]

I think he just means u get that timelines version not necessarily their accomplishments if that makes sense. Loke u get wtv gimmick they were using so.ih ur gimmick is cm punk the nxt pro

 

[Smart Marx]

I don’t personally agree. 2010 Punk in a match is fire.

Don’t matter how many matches he had if this in best card with NXT superstars, lol.

I thoroughly disagree with premise, but what’s done.

 

[JakeYourBooty]

If it’s a card we’re making, then it shouldn’t matter right? If we take 2010 CM Punk and put him a match, it’s gonna be a good match right? Based on 2010 Punk?

Cuz I don’t see how him having 4 matches weakens his value on a match card. If we let just ranking out rosters based on their careers and not doing a match card, I misjudged and shouldn’t have taken him I guess.

I just don’t see how you can base it on both.

I think it weakens it in the eyes of the voters


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro