WS Christmas Mafia 2021

[Bobby Barrows]

Unvote

Vote Peter

This is a wagon I'm more than fine with, he and I have gone back and forth before earlier and it didn't really assuage me much.

 

[Ekkologix]

It doesn’t make me anything, I don’t need to try and discredit your nothing push on me with no case and no facts, you’re doing it yourself.

Now if you’ll excuse I gotta finish catching up and scumhunt cause you’re distracting me and it’s getting annoying

vote peter first

 

[Dr_Professor83]

Dude, the lack of consistency in these accusations is killing me lmao.

Either you think I conjured it out of thin air or you acknowledge that it's founded in me having had reason to read him that way.

What lack of consistency? I think your reasons were unjustified. I’m very consistent on that. And it sounded like you admitted that it was a weird read that would make you look bad bc it wasn’t very justified.

 

[Ekkologix]

If we get close to majority, I would like to be the vote that hammers btw.

 

[Showtime]

Idk could be a decoy (which would make magic scum) i’m not really seeing much scummy and it’s essentially based on him calling Magic town so like idk it’s not concrete

i mean it isn't just on him calling me town, it was his entire play up until that point.

 

[Junkette]

i mean it isn't just on him calling me town, it was his entire play up until that point.

Thoughts on his play now?

 

[Showtime]

Thoughts on his play now?

literally nothing has changed for me, i said as much. im not even sure you understand the basis of the accusations, which is his play is very safe and within bounds to avoid stirring the pot at all.

also prof i havent forgotten about your games from your other site, ill look at them later when i have time.

 

[Junkette]

vote peter first

I’d rather vote scum. I just don’t see it in Peter

Vote Juice

I’m fine with this.

 

[RetepAdam.]

literally nothing has changed for me, i said as much. im not even sure you understand the basis of the accusations, which is his play is very safe and within bounds to avoid stirring the pot at all.

also prof i havent forgotten about your games from your other site, ill look at them later when i have time.

So, your argument is I'm playing safe and Dr_Professor's argument is I'm off the board and Jeff's argument is that I'm pushing but then your argument is that I'm coasting.

You can see how I'm a little bit frustrated with the state of this wagon, yeah?

 

[Junkette]

literally nothing has changed for me, i said as much. im not even sure you understand the basis of the accusations, which is his play is very safe and within bounds to avoid stirring the pot at all.

also prof i havent forgotten about your games from your other site, ill look at them later when i have time.

I mean Peter generally plays pretty safe, he’s not a me or a you type

 

[RetepAdam.]

That and the fact it's been painfully obvious this is where things were going to end up.

 

[Dr_Professor83]

So, your argument is I'm playing safe and Dr_Professor's argument is I'm off the board and Jeff's argument is that I'm pushing but then your argument is that I'm coasting.

You can see how I'm a little bit frustrated with the state of this wagon, yeah?

Wym off the board? Not familiar with the phrase.

 

[CakeWalker]

I’d rather vote scum. I just don’t see it in Peter

Vote Juice

I’m fine with this.

Without a reason - sounding despy

 

[Ekkologix]

I’d rather vote scum. I just don’t see it in Peter

Vote Juice

I’m fine with this.

juice vote is past the expiration date
vote peter

 

[RetepAdam.]

What lack of consistency? I think your reasons were unjustified. I’m very consistent on that. And it sounded like you admitted that it was a weird read that would make you look bad bc it wasn’t very justified.

It wasn't a weird read to me, which literally covers all the bases of the premise.

But since you were insistent that I couldn't have just naturally come to the conclusion, I was asking you what my endgame was for the scenario where it was an irrational read.