Would you prefer Dolph to cash in on RAW, SmackDown or PPV?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
DannyWoods said:
Hey i was just responding to the OP. I think it would be great despite everything you mentioned. Everyone knew Mick was winning the WWF championship and from that night on WWF/E owned the ratings. So give it a shot, what will it hurt?

It would hurt Dolph, it would hurt his long reign as Mr MITB holder, it would hurt the champion who lost it. Cashing in MITB is a segment which dominates the show. If it happens at a PPV it's the thing you're talking about afterwards, if it happens on RAW it's the thing you talk about afterwards and are shown constant recaps of, it's a big big thing. It shouldn't happen on a taped show that WWE and its audience don't care about. Dolph deservers more than that.

You can't compare modern SmackDown to WWF where Foley won, you just can't. Just my opinion however.
 

Danielson

Champion
Joined
Sep 29, 2012
Messages
27,213
Reaction score
5,799
Points
0
Age
36
Location
Toledo, Ohio
Website
twitter.com
Crayo said:
It would hurt Dolph, it would hurt his long reign as Mr MITB holder, it would hurt the champion who lost it. Cashing in MITB is a segment which dominates the show. If it happens at a PPV it's the thing you're talking about afterwards, if it happens on RAW it's the thing you talk about afterwards and are shown constant recaps of, it's a big big thing. It shouldn't happen on a taped show that WWE and its audience don't care about. Dolph deservers more than that.

You can't compare modern SmackDown to WWF where Foley won, you just can't. Just my opinion however.

He does deserve more and it was just a suggestion really. I think the WHC is pretty much a joke though and they've given it to him before for 11 min, so hopefully this time it turns out better for him. I like Dolph and wouldn't mind the next PPV
 

Cloud

Champion
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
10,486
Reaction score
1,562
Points
118
Age
40
PPV obvs as it gives it more status. Plus ppl are saying the WHC is less prestigious these days that is true. But surely if anyone can raise the belt again to the top level its DZ.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
DannyWoods said:
He does deserve more and it was just a suggestion really. I think the WHC is pretty much a joke though and they've given it to him before for 11 min, so hopefully this time it turns out better for him. I like Dolph and wouldn't mind the next PPV

Yeah he said himself in a non-kayfabe interview that he doesn't count his first reign at all, and WHEN he successfully cashes in it will be his first title reign. I agree with that, the first one was a complete joke.

TLC I guess is perfect for Dolph.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danielson

Farooq

Chairwoman of The New Day
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
23,193
Reaction score
7,027
Points
0
Location
619
Undertaker in a WHC championship match at Wrestlemania, Undertaker wins and Ziggler cashes in on the Deadman.
 

Farooq

Chairwoman of The New Day
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
23,193
Reaction score
7,027
Points
0
Location
619
Never said Taker lost :isee: