Would you be mad if...

[Snowman1]

Sheamus losing the title in any way, shape, or form would be a good thing. Idgaf if it's at a house show.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

Sheamus losing the title in any way, shape, or form would be a good thing. Idgaf if it's at a house show.

Obviously the idea of Ziggler taking the belt off of Sheamus is good, but it's a kick in the dick from WWE to do it on a Tuesday and not show it to us until Friday. It ruins the moment and there is no reason for it.

 

[I'll See Ya Kia]

I'd be happy for him.

 

[Stopspot]

I was be mad if Figger cash in and win the world title! ipebomb:

I will take great joy in your tears of rage when Ziggler becomes a champion.

 

[Asskicker]

Yeah because it would lead to him losing it the same night. #wwelogic

 

[Crayo]

I'd be happy for him.

I think we all would, it's more about how much momentum you can get out of it. What has more of an impact, a cash in at a PPV or on a taped SmackDown?

 

[I'll See Ya Kia]

I think we all would, it's more about how much momentum you can get out of it. What has more of an impact, a cash in at a PPV or on a taped SmackDown?

That sounds beautiful too. I enjoy his enthusiasm and like to see him achieve his potential

 

[Wacokid27]

The only recent "title changes" that took place on Smackdown were Orton beating Christian and the "Bryan beats Henry.....no he doesn't" moment that was probably the actual start of the Daniel Bryan heel turn.

As for Ziggler cashing in on a taped Smackdown, I can only see it if there was an injury they were covering up (Sheamus had been legit injured and they had him beat down by ADR, "injuring" him, and Ziggler came out and cashed in). I think that if it were to happen on a Smackdown, it would be a special live episode, which would do if they decided not to do it at a PPV.

wk