just look at it as dark comedy. its like torture. you want to be like WTF IS THIS SHIT but you just sit and take it. reminds me of watching the Raiders
exclude me from that "we all"Sounds more like classic slapstick comedy. Some dumbass (Vince) falls on their face and we all mock him for it.
And also probably should have thought before thinking we'd get an actual discussion about this going on this board, of course we all want Bryan as champ any way we can get it. 1:
No because he'd obviously just lose it to Batista in the three-way at Wrestlemania. And Bryan walking into Wrestlemania as champion and then LOSING it to Batista would only drive the fans crazier than they have been already. I mean, if turning Batista into a mega heel is their intention (which I imagine it isn't since we've just gone the past several months with a heel champion) then go for it, but otherwise, keep Bryan away from him and the title for the time being. Just program Bryan with Triple H since the conclusion of that story pretty much writes itself, and then have him chase the belt later (if there is a 'later' that is... I'm predicting that Cena will have the strap for at least 3-4 months before dropping it to Reigns at next year's WM, and I wouldn't put it past possibility that Brock is the one to defeat Batista for the strap later in the year... not really much time for Bryan to have a run with the gold anywhere in-between.)
Doesn't mean shit. If WWE wants him around more, they'll pay him to show up more. Pretty simple.Brock ain't getting a title run this year. WrestleMania is his last appearance until 2015, unfortunately. He's on the same contract as last year and that's all his dates used up, according to a podcast I listen to.
Doesn't mean shit. If WWE wants him around more, they'll pay him to show up more. Pretty simple.
Vince: Hey Brock we're gonna pay you a million dollars to work an angle at SummerslamNope. WWE had to persuade Brock to work that many in the first place. If WWE had it their way, he'd be on a full-time contract. No way is he going to re-negotiate during a year. I think it's 12 or 15 dates per year or something, which Brock wants to stick to.
Vince: Hey Brock we're gonna pay you a million dollars to work an angle at Summerslam
Brock: OK Vince
again, you are being way to smarky by sitting there taking Brock's rumored contract to be the gospel. 1.) We don't know if the rumors of his contract are even correct and 2.) is the point I've been making
Brock isn't motivated to travel 320 days a year. That doesn't mean he is going to suddenly refuse to work after Mania because his contract allegedly is for X number of appearances that were already spent. I sincerely doubt Brock has any desire to sit on his ass for 9 straight months.Well yeah I'm using common sense. It's unlikely either parties would do that. Brock's not motivated to work in WWE. That's why he left in the first place, right? IMO the next time we see Brock after losing to The Streak is next year's RTWM, probably vs Rock.
Reigns vs Brock would be absolutely tits.Yeah, I want to see Brock on RAW for 2/3 months straight, which would allow him to hold the title. Imagine him winning it at RR, while Reigns wins the Rumble, and Brock putting him over at Mania.