Women's Royal Rumble should be scrapped

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


BeardsOfWarjStylesXL

The Showoff
Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Messages
535
Reaction score
355
Points
0
Website
wcwguy.wix.com
I actually enjoyed the women's rumble...but if asuka wins it again I swear i will fking rage quit; that's a term used in gaming industry when the opponent outplays you and you have to leave the game because you can't compete anymore ;) I will go fking crazy if asuka wins another fking match i swear!!! Anyways regarding the match itself keep it but make it standard for quality rather then quantity
 

bullyballmm

babeball
Main Eventer
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Messages
16,475
Reaction score
1,481
Points
0
Age
31
Location
AU
Have they even said they are going to have another one at the next Rumble? I don't know if, excluding NXT and returning wrestlers, that the Women's Division has 30 women in it. Let me see:
-Alexa
-Ronda
-Nikki
-Brie
-Tamina
-Nia Jax
-Ember Moon
-Dana Brooke
-Alicia Fox
-Mickie James
-Sasha Banks
-Bayley
-Ruby Riott
-Liv Morgan
-Sarah Logan
-Natalya
-Becky Lynch
-Charlotte
-Naomi
-Asuka
-Billie Kay
-Peyton Royce
-Mandy Rose
-Sonya Deville
-Zelina Vega
-Lana
-Carmella

So 26. Not even 30. Now I may be forgetting some people, but even then the fact that some of those are questionable additions (Hard to tell if one or both of the Bellas will stick around after this Evolution PPV, Zelina is more of a manager than a wrestler), there will be champions and challengers who don't compete in it (or maybe they pull double duty, who knows), and there is always injuries that make that list smaller (e.g. Alexa could be out some time with her injury).

Having a one off Royal Rumble this year was fine with all the NXT participants and past stars competing. But they can't resort to doing that every single year, a Royal Rumble should be made up of primarily main roster, active stars.
 

Solid Snake

New Member
Champion
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
51,392
Reaction score
19,899
Points
0
Have they even said they are going to have another one at the next Rumble? I don't know if, excluding NXT and returning wrestlers, that the Women's Division has 30 women in it. Let me see:
-Alexa
-Ronda
-Nikki
-Brie
-Tamina
-Nia Jax
-Ember Moon
-Dana Brooke
-Alicia Fox
-Mickie James
-Sasha Banks
-Bayley
-Ruby Riott
-Liv Morgan
-Sarah Logan
-Natalya
-Becky Lynch
-Charlotte
-Naomi
-Asuka
-Billie Kay
-Peyton Royce
-Mandy Rose
-Sonya Deville
-Zelina Vega
-Lana
-Carmella

So 26. Not even 30. Now I may be forgetting some people, but even then the fact that some of those are questionable additions (Hard to tell if one or both of the Bellas will stick around after this Evolution PPV, Zelina is more of a manager than a wrestler), there will be champions and challengers who don't compete in it (or maybe they pull double duty, who knows), and there is always injuries that make that list smaller (e.g. Alexa could be out some time with her injury).

Having a one off Royal Rumble this year was fine with all the NXT participants and past stars competing. But they can't resort to doing that every single year, a Royal Rumble should be made up of primarily main roster, active stars.

They always have "legends" come back though.
 

Solid Snake

New Member
Champion
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
51,392
Reaction score
19,899
Points
0
Wow...this thread looks like it was a lot fun.
200.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Grievous 3D

Redboy123@

Banned
Joined
Jan 5, 2018
Messages
6,194
Reaction score
3,390
Points
113
Have they even said they are going to have another one at the next Rumble? I don't know if, excluding NXT and returning wrestlers, that the Women's Division has 30 women in it. Let me see:
-Alexa
-Ronda
-Nikki
-Brie
-Tamina
-Nia Jax
-Ember Moon
-Dana Brooke
-Alicia Fox
-Mickie James
-Sasha Banks
-Bayley
-Ruby Riott
-Liv Morgan
-Sarah Logan
-Natalya
-Becky Lynch
-Charlotte
-Naomi
-Asuka
-Billie Kay
-Peyton Royce
-Mandy Rose
-Sonya Deville
-Zelina Vega
-Lana
-Carmella

So 26. Not even 30. Now I may be forgetting some people, but even then the fact that some of those are questionable additions (Hard to tell if one or both of the Bellas will stick around after this Evolution PPV, Zelina is more of a manager than a wrestler), there will be champions and challengers who don't compete in it (or maybe they pull double duty, who knows), and there is always injuries that make that list smaller (e.g. Alexa could be out some time with her injury).

Having a one off Royal Rumble this year was fine with all the NXT participants and past stars competing. But they can't resort to doing that every single year, a Royal Rumble should be made up of primarily main roster, active stars.
Stupid excuse not to have another rumble. They now have more woman on the main roster. They are now more prepared for next year then they were this year.
 

Jeffry Mason

Your Local Sports Team Sucks
Joined
Jan 16, 2017
Messages
7,242
Reaction score
2,635
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Parts Unknown
We hold weekly public bannings every Wednesday at 8PM.
Can we actually implement this and [HASHTAG]#BanReag[/HASHTAG] on a weekly basis? Even if it's just for an hour a week? It would be so satisfying and would really boost forum morale.

This actually gives me a good idea for a thread, oddly enough
 

Jacob Fox

Quiet You
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
63,934
Reaction score
14,554
Points
118
It is high time that WWE scraps the Women's Royal Rumble because it is so cheesy and so effin predictable. Like there's still 3 months to do the event and yet we already know who's gonna win the match. It's going to be Charlotte or Alexa Bliss and trust me I hate when those old milfs come to the ring and pretend that they can wrestle and over the top rope rule is a bit of disadvantage for women because most of the women are shorter than the top rope itself
lmao.gif
.

Because, God knows, the men's Royal Rumble is NEVER predictable. I mean, no one expected that Shawn Michaels would actually win in 1995 even though the guy he was feuding with was champion. And then, no one could have imagined that Michaels would win again in 1996, even though six months before the event it was obvious they were planning for Michaels vs Bret Hart at Wrestlemania. And don't get me started on Stone Cold Steve Austin in 1998. I mean, we would never have expected that he would win and face the Rock at Mania just because why would a character who hates Vince McMahon ever be considered to be at the Mania main event with McMahon's hand picked champion.

Oh OMG I was so shocked in 2013 when John Cena won and went on to face the Rock for the second time. I mean, WWE made it very clear to ALL of us that Cena vs the Rock was only once in a lifetime. I mean they fooled us pretty good. In fact I was in utter shock when Cena won the Rumble at the same event the Rock won the title... I mean what are the chances? It was soooooooo much of a surprise.